Title
Ban on laser emissions near airports
Law
Caap Advisory Circular No. 01-15
Decision Date
Mar 20, 2015
The CAAP Advisory Circular No. 01-15 prohibits the unauthorized projection of laser beams or high-intensity lights near airports and flight paths, imposing penalties of up to three years imprisonment or fines between Php 50,000 and Php 500,000 to ensure the safety of aircraft navigation.

Questions (CAAP Advisory Circular No. 01-15)

It warns the public about an increase in incidents of laser beams or high intensity lights being projected near airports and flight paths, and informs that unauthorized emissions interfere with safe aircraft navigation and are prohibited.

Unauthorized projection/emission of laser beams or high intensity lights on areas proximate to airports and on flight paths.

Laser attacks can distract, disrupt, disorient, and in extreme cases incapacitate flight crew, impairing their ability to perform duties—especially during take-off and landing.

Section 81(b)(6) of RA 9497 (Civil Aviation Authority Act of 2008).

Imprisonment of not more than three (3) years, and/or a fine not less than Php50,000.00 but not exceeding Php500,000.00, as determined by the court.

It covers both laser beams and projection/emission of high intensity lights.

The unauthorized emission must be on areas proximate to airports and/or along flight paths.

It refers to any unauthorized laser/high intensity light emissions that affect the ability of pilots to safely navigate and operate the aircraft, due to distraction or disorientation, among others.

Any unauthorized emission is considered prohibited; authorization is a key distinction from lawful/allowed uses.

Take-off and landing, when pilots’ attention and visual cues are critical.

It states there is an “alarming increase” in occurrences of such emissions near airports and flight paths.

The advisory circular mainly serves as a notice/forewarning and guidance; the offense and penalty are based on the underlying statutory provision in RA 9497, specifically Section 81(b)(6).

They may be prosecuted for interference to safe navigation under Section 81(b)(6) of RA 9497, punishable by imprisonment (up to three years), a fine (Php50,000 to Php500,000), or both.

A potential relevant consideration would be whether the emission was authorized by competent authority or conducted under lawful permission; authorization could negate “unauthorized” conduct.

It was adopted on 20 March 2015 and filed on 10 April 2015.


Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.