G.R. No. 173252 - Unisource Commercial and Development Corp. vs. Chung

Ask AI

G.R. No. 173252: Unisource Commercial and Development Corp. vs. Chung

Getting related questions...
What do you want to know about the case?
Your conversations and searches stay on your device. We do not store or track your activity on our servers. To know more about our privacy commitment see jur.ph/privacy Ask AI provides quick answers grounded in full case texts to avoid mistakes. Always verify with the original text.

Ask AI

Title Supreme Court: Unisource Commercial and Development Corp. vs. Chung

Case: G.R. No. 173252

Decision Date: Jul 17, 2009

Petitioner sought to cancel a voluntary easement on its land, arguing the dominant estate had alternate access. Courts ruled the easement, binding on heirs and assigns, could only be extinguished by mutual agreement or renunciation, not by alternate access or subdivision.

heirs

assigns

dismissal

Short 12 min

0.7x of typical case length

END