Title
Valdez vs. Dabon
Case
A.M. No. CA-07-21-P
Decision Date
Jun 22, 2007
A court employee engaged in an illicit affair, harassed the complainant's wife, and traveled abroad without authorization, leading to a fine and employment ban despite resignation.
A

Case Summary (A.M. No. CA-07-21-P)

Procedural Background

The administrative complaint against Atty. Dabon was filed by Nelson Valdez and subsequently assigned to Justice Rosalinda Asuncion-Vicente for investigation. Initial attempts to serve court orders to Atty. Dabon were unsuccessful, as he was purportedly out of the country. Efforts included courier services and process servers visiting various addresses associated with the respondent, including his residence in Pandacan, Manila, and a provincial address in San Fernando, Pampanga.

Allegations of Harassment and Immorality

Nelson Valdez presented evidence outlining a five-year illicit affair between Atty. Dabon and Sonia starting in November 2000. Allegations included that Sonia attempted to end the relationship but was met with harassment and threats from Atty. Dabon. Incidents described by the complainant included Atty. Dabon forcibly boarding Sonia’s car and bringing her to a motel against her will. The complaints culminated in formal accusations of gross immorality and threats.

Falsification and Unauthorized Travel

It was alleged that Atty. Dabon left for the United States shortly after the complaint was lodged, without the requisite travel authority from the Supreme Court. Nelson claimed that the respondent omitted his status as a government employee in his embarkation card, constituting falsification and misrepresentation.

Findings of the Investigating Justice

The Investigating Justice found substantial evidence supporting the allegations made by the complainant, noting that the respondent's actions constituted gross immoral conduct. The evidence included sworn statements from Sonia's coworkers, asserting the reality of Atty. Dabon’s harassment and the illicit relationship. It was further established that Atty. Dabon’s trip to the USA was an attempt to evade the consequences of the pending administrative complaint.

Violation of Administrative Rules

Atty. Dabon was found to have violated Administrative Matter No. 99-12-08-SC, which requires a judicial employee to secure travel authority before leaving the country. The Investigating Justice determined that this violation, coupled with the evidence of gross immorality, warranted administrative action.

Recommended Sanction

While the Investigating Justice initially recommended a fine equivalent to six months' salary

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.