Title
Urbano vs. Intermediate Appellate Court
Case
G.R. No. 72964
Decision Date
Jan 7, 1988
Filomeno Urbano hacked Marcelo Javier, causing a wound. Javier later died from tetanus. The Supreme Court acquitted Urbano, ruling tetanus as an intervening cause, but left civil liability unresolved.

Case Summary (G.R. No. L-49430)

Factual Background

On October 23, 1980, Urbano found his rice harvest flooded by water from an irrigation canal. He confronted Javier and Emilio Erfe, who had opened the canal. In the ensuing quarrel, Urbano hacked Javier with a two-foot bolo, inflicting a two-inch incised wound on the right palm and a hack on the left leg. Urbano’s daughter intervened to prevent further injury. Javier was initially treated by Dr. Meneses, then examined by Dr. Padilla, who issued a medico-legal certificate estimating a 7–9-day incapacitation.

Amicable Settlement and Subsequent Events

Through Councilman Solis’s intercession, Urbano and Javier reached an amicable settlement on October 27, 1980, under Presidential Decree No. 1508. Urbano advanced Php 700 for Javier’s medical expenses. On November 14, 1980, Javier was admitted to Nazareth General Hospital exhibiting tetanus symptoms (lockjaw, convulsions); he died the following day. Dr. Exconde concluded death resulted from tetanus infection of the healing wound.

Procedural History

An information for homicide was filed on April 10, 1981, before the Circuit Criminal Court of Dagupan City. After trial, Urbano was convicted and sentenced to an indeterminate term (12 years prision mayor minimum to 17 years, 4 months and 1 day reclusion temporal maximum) and ordered to indemnify Javier’s heirs (Php 12,000). On appeal, the Intermediate Appellate Court affirmed the conviction, increased indemnity to Php 30,000, and denied Urbano’s motion for new trial. Urbano then petitioned the Supreme Court.

Applicable Constitution and Legal Framework

Decision Date: January 7, 1988. The 1973 Constitution applies. Governing laws include Article 4(1) of the Revised Penal Code (criminal liability for all natural and logical consequences of one’s unlawful act) and P.D. 1508, Section 2(3) (settlement of minor offenses).

Issue

Whether Urbano’s hacking, which caused a wound later infected with tetanus, renders him criminally liable for Javier’s death, or whether an intervening cause and the barangay settlement bar homicide liability.

Analysis on Proximate Cause

The Court defined proximate cause as the first act that directly produces the injury in a continuous sequence unbroken by any efficient intervening cause. Lower courts held that tetanus infection was a natural and logical consequence of the hacking, citing medical testimony that the disease entered through the wound.

Consideration of Intervening Cause

Reviewing tetanus’ incubation (2–56 days, most within 14) and onset periods, the Court found it medically improbable that a severe infection existed immediately after the October 23 wound. Symptoms appeared 22 days later with rapid progression, suggesting infection occurred sometime afte

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.