Title
Urbano vs. Intermediate Appellate Court
Case
G.R. No. 72964
Decision Date
Jan 7, 1988
Filomeno Urbano hacked Marcelo Javier, causing a wound. Javier later died from tetanus. The Supreme Court acquitted Urbano, ruling tetanus as an intervening cause, but left civil liability unresolved.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 72964)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Circumstances of the Hacking
    • On October 23, 1980 at about 8:00 AM, petitioner Filomeno Urbano went to his ricefield in Barangay Anonang, San Fabian, Pangasinan, found his palay flooded by an overflowed irrigation canal and confronted Marcelo Javier and Emilio Erfe, who admitted opening the canal.
    • A quarrel ensued. Urbano unsheathed a bolo and hacked Javier on the right palm (used to parry the blow) and subsequently on the left leg, causing swelling. Further hacking was prevented by Urbano’s daughter.
  • Initial Medical Attention and Amicable Settlement
    • Javier was brought first to Dr. Mario Meneses for treatment, then to Dr. Guillermo Padilla for medico-legal examination, who certified a 2-inch incised wound on the right palm with a 7–9 day incapacity.
    • On October 27, 1980, mediated by Barangay Councilman Felipe Solis, Urbano and Javier formalized an amicable settlement at the San Fabian Police Station: Urbano agreed to pay ₱700 for medical expenses (₱400 advanced there; ₱300 paid on November 3).
  • Onset of Tetanus and Death
    • On November 14, 1980 (22 days after the incident), Javier was rushed to Nazareth General Hospital with trismus (lockjaw) and convulsions; Dr. Edmundo Exconde diagnosed tetanus infection of the healing wound.
    • Javier died on November 15, 1980 at 4:18 PM despite resuscitation efforts.
  • Criminal Proceedings and New Evidence
    • An information for homicide was filed April 10, 1981; upon trial, the Circuit Criminal Court convicted Urbano, sentencing him to 12 years prision mayor as minimum to 17 years, 4 months, 1 day reclusion temporal as maximum, and ordered indemnity of ₱12,000 to the heirs.
    • The Intermediate Appellate Court affirmed conviction and increased indemnity to ₱30,000. Urbano’s motion for new trial, based on an affidavit by Barangay Captain Soliven claiming Javier caught fish in shallow canals after a typhoon (possible independent infection source), was denied. Urbano petitioned the Supreme Court.

Issues:

  • Whether Urbano’s hacking of Javier is criminally responsible for Javier’s subsequent death under Article 4, Revised Penal Code, as the natural and logical consequence of the unlawful act.
  • Whether an efficient intervening cause—tetanus infection occurring well after the wound was inflicted—breaks the causal chain and exculpates Urbano from homicide liability.
  • Whether the amicable settlement under PD No. 1508, Section 2(3), extinguished Urbano’s criminal liability for any injury inflicted.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.