Case Summary (G.R. No. 5889)
Facts of the Case
On August 18, 1909, Look Chaw was accused of engaging in the business of selling opium without the necessary authorization from the Collector of Internal Revenue. Internal-revenue agent C. J. Milliron testified about Vicente Base's actions in bringing opium to the governor of Cebu, allegedly sold by the accused. Look Chaw confessed to selling thirty cans of opium to Base but claimed no monetary gain from this sale, stating that the money discovered on-board the British steamship Erroll was seized from him and that he intended to introduce the opium contraband into Mexico.
Charges and Trial Proceedings
The charges against Look Chaw included selling opium without legal authorization, as delineated in the pertinent sections of Act No. 1761. The trial court convicted him, sentencing him to a year of imprisonment and a fine of P2,000, pending additional subsidiary imprisonment in the event of insolvency. The court also ruled for the confiscation of exhibits related to the case and mandated Look Chaw’s transfer to customs authorities post-sentence to enforce immigration laws.
Appeal Arguments
Look Chaw contested his conviction on the grounds that his actions did not constitute engaging in the business of selling opium, arguing that an isolated sale does not equate to conducting business. He invoked section 15 of the Act, which emphasizes the necessity of obtaining prior authorization for such transactions. The defense delineated between single transactions (isolated sales) and continuous operations (engagement in selling as a business).
Court Findings on Charges
The appellate court addressed the distinction between selling and possessing opium as outlined in separate sections of the relevant act. It clarified that the sale of opium without authorization constituted a criminal act and rejected the appellant's interpretation of his actions as mere isolated sales. The court deemed the evidence provided, including the confession, sufficient to uphold the lower court's decision.
Double Jeopardy Defense
An additional argument raised by the defense concerned claims of double jeopardy. Look Chaw contended that he should not be tried twice for linked offenses—possession and sale of opium. The court found that the defendant's counsel had effectively induced the court to separate complaints regarding possession and sale, thus nullifying the double jeopardy claim. The court reasoned that possession could exist independently of the sale, and as such, the defendant's convictions for both crimes were warranted.
Judicial D
...continue readingCase Syllabus (G.R. No. 5889)
Case Background
- The case is part of a larger legal proceeding, identified as Case No. 5887 and bears No. 5889 on the general docket.
- The complaint alleges that Look Chaw (also known as Luk Chiu) engaged in the sale of opium without the required authorization from the Collector of Internal Revenue.
- The incident took place on August 18, 1909, within the municipality of Cebu.
Facts of the Case
- C. J. Milliron, an internal-revenue agent, testified regarding the involvement of Vicente Base, who presented a can of opium to the governor of Cebu as evidence of Look Chaw's sale of opium.
- Look Chaw confessed to having sold 30 cans of opium to Vicente Base on August 15, 1909, but claimed he had not received payment for the sale.
- The accused stated he purchased 137 cans of opium in Hong Kong with the intention of smuggling it into Mexico but ended up in Cebu due to a change in the vessel's route.
Trial and Sentencing
- The Court of First Instance of Cebu sentenced Look Chaw to one year in prison and a fine of P2,000, with provisions for additional subsidiary imprisonment if he could not pay the fine.
- The court ordered the confiscation of evidence linked to the case and s