Title
Simon vs. Aragon
Case
A.M. No. MTJ-05-1576
Decision Date
Feb 3, 2005
Judge Alipio M. Aragon fined P7,000 for unauthorized notarization of private documents post-Circular No. 1-90, violating judicial notarial limits.
A

Case Summary (G.R. No. L-27598)

Allegations of Unauthorized Notarial Practice

In his complaint dated October 18, 2002, Simon accused Judge Aragon of engaging in unauthorized notarial practice by preparing and acknowledging various private documents and contracts that were unrelated to his judicial duties. Simon noted that the documents failed to include a certification indicating the absence of any qualified lawyer or notary public in San Pablo, Isabela, in violation of Circular No. 1-90. The complainant supported his allegations with several notarial documents executed by the judge between 1986 and 2000.

Respondent’s Justification and Admission

Respondent Judge Aragon admitted to notarizing the said documents but justified his actions by claiming there were no available lawyers or notaries public in San Pablo, Isabela, during the period from 1983 to 1992. He asserted that upon learning about Circular No. 1-90 in 1993, he ceased notarizing private documents. He claimed that the notarial fees were paid to the Office of the Municipal Treasurer, and therefore, he did not profit from these actions. The judge also argued that he could not be held liable for any violations of Circular No. 1-90 prior to its promulgation on February 26, 1990.

Investigation and Findings

Following the complaint's referral on June 23, 2003, to the Executive Judge of the Regional Trial Court of Cabagan for investigation, Judge Isaac R. De Alban reported on August 20, 2004, finding the respondent judge guilty of notarizing private documents without the required certification mandated by Circular No. 1-90. However, the investigative judge recommended that the Circular should apply only to documents notarized after its effective date, suggesting a penalty of P1,000 for each of the seven documents notarized in violation of its provisions.

Office of the Court Administrator Recommendations

On October 6, 2004, the case was referred to the Office of the Court Administrator, which, on January 3, 2005, adopted the findings and recommendations of Judge De Alban. The Court acknowledged that judges in MCTC and MTC could serve as notaries public ex officio only in specific capacities directly related to their official responsibilities.

Violation of Circular No. 1-90

The Court examined the records and confirmed that Judge Aragon did notarize seven private documents after the Circular's enactment without the required certification regarding the lack of n

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.