Title
Sayson y Parocha vs. People
Case
G.R. No. 249289
Decision Date
Sep 28, 2020
Petitioner acquitted of illegal drug possession due to prosecution's failure to comply with chain of custody rules, compromising evidence integrity.
A

Case Summary (G.R. No. 249289)

Charge and Background

The petitioner was charged with two counts: one for Illegal Possession of Dangerous Drugs, and another for Illegal Sale of Dangerous Drugs, both under Sections 5 and 11, Article II of Republic Act No. 9165. The first charge involved the possession of five sachets of methamphetamine hydrochloride (shabu), while the second charge revolved around the alleged sale of a sachet of the same substance. The accusations stemmed from a police-operated buy-bust operation on July 25, 2016.

Prosecution's Case

On the day of the buy-bust operation, police officers, acting on information from a confidential informant, successfully apprehended the petitioner while he was allegedly selling illegal drugs. Upon search, multiple sachets of shabu were confiscated from his possession, which led to his arrest. The confiscated items were marked and inventoried at a nearby Barangay Hall before being brought to the police station and later tested, confirming the presence of methamphetamine.

Defense's Argument

In his defense, the petitioner denied the allegations, asserting that he was at the residence of his relative at the time of the incident. He contended that the police officers conducted an unwarranted search and coerced him and his neighbors into confessing to drug-related offenses.

Ruling of the Regional Trial Court (RTC)

On September 8, 2017, the RTC found the petitioner guilty of Illegal Possession of Dangerous Drugs, imposing a sentence of 12 years and 1 day to 14 years of imprisonment, along with a fine of PHP 300,000. However, the RTC acquitted him of the charge of Illegal Sale due to insufficient evidence.

Court of Appeals (CA) Ruling

The petitioner appealed the RTC decision. On March 14, 2019, the CA upheld the RTC's ruling, affirming that all elements of illegal possession were proven and justified the protocols followed during the marking and inventory of the seized items, despite the absence of the required witnesses.

Court’s Assessment of the Chain of Custody

The Court highlighted the necessity of demonstrating a secure chain of custody in drug-related cases. It emphasized that the identity of the prohibited drug must be established with certainty and must comply with the procedural requirements for marking and inventory as mandated by law. The Court stressed that the absence of required witnesses during the inventory undermined the evidential value of the seized items.

Non-Compliance with Legal Procedures

The Court found that the prosecution failed to satisfactorily demonstrate genuine efforts to comply with legal requiremen

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.