Title
Republic vs. Narceda
Case
G.R. No. 182760
Decision Date
Apr 10, 2013
A man sought to declare his missing wife presumptively dead to remarry; courts ruled the decision final, barring appeal on lack of well-founded belief.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 182760)

Background of the Case

Robert P. Narceda was married to Marina B. Narceda on July 22, 1987. Marina was a minor at the time of their marriage. In 1994, Marina left for Singapore and has not returned nor communicated with Robert since. After learning from a mutual acquaintance that Marina was possibly living with another husband, Robert sought a judicial declaration of her presumptive death, given her prolonged absence.

Procedural History

On May 16, 2002, Robert filed a petition with the RTC, which granted the petition in a decision dated May 5, 2005. The RTC declared the presumptive death of Marina for all legal intents and purposes. This decision was subsequently appealed by the Office of the Solicitor General (OSG) representing the Republic of the Philippines.

Court of Appeals Decision

The Court of Appeals dismissed the appeal on November 14, 2007, ruling that it lacked jurisdiction because the decision of the RTC was immediately final and executory as provided by Article 247 of the Family Code. The OSG's motion for reconsideration was denied on April 29, 2008.

Arguments of the Petitioner

The petitioner asserted that the Court of Appeals erred in dismissing the appeal and argued that Robert failed to establish a well-founded belief regarding Marina's presumed death, a necessary condition under the Family Code for a subsequent marriage.

Summary Proceedings and Jurisdiction

According to the Family Code, matters relating to the declaration of presumptive death are summary proceedings. Article 247 explicitly states that decisions rendered in such proceedings are immediately final and executory, which eliminates the right to appeal and mandates that parties pursue a petition for certiorari if aggrieved. The OSG mistakenly filed a notice of appeal under the erroneous assumption that an appeal was permissible.

Supreme Court Ruling

The Supreme Court affirmed the decisions of the lower courts, reiterating that the RTC's ruling was final and could not be

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.