Title
Republic vs. Court of Appeals
Case
G.R. No. 108998
Decision Date
Aug 24, 1994
Filipino spouses acquired land, later became Canadian citizens, and sought title registration. SC upheld their vested rights, affirming land as private property despite citizenship change.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 108998)

Key Dates

June 17, 1978 – Purchase of Lots 347 and 348 in San Pablo City
February 5, 1987 – Application for Torrens registration filed
August 24, 1994 – En Banc decision

Applicable Law

1987 Constitution, Art. XII, §§ 7–8 (transfer of private lands; former natural-born citizens)
BP 185 (privilege for former Filipino citizens to acquire private residence lands)
Public Land Act (CA 141), as amended by PD 1073 (tacking of predecessor’s possession since June 12, 1945)
Property Registration Decree (PD 1529) – Torrens system confirms existing titles

Facts

– In 1978, as Filipino citizens, spouses Lapina and de Vega bought two parcels (total 91.77 sq m.) from Cristeta Dazo Belen.
– Their predecessors had occupied the lots openly, continuously, exclusively, and notoriously since at least 1937.
– By 1987, both spouses had naturalized as Canadian citizens and sought judicial confirmation of their Torrens titles.
– The Republic opposed, contending that (a) the lots remained public until court confirmation, (b) respondents lacked 30-year possession since 1945, and (c) foreign nationals cannot register private land.

Procedural History

– Regional Trial Court approved registration, finding valid tacking of predecessor’s 30-year possession and noting Torrens as confirmation, not acquisition, of title.
– Court of Appeals affirmed, emphasizing respondents’ Filipino citizenship at acquisition and uninterrupted possession under CA 141 and PD 1073.
– Republic filed a belated petition for review before the Supreme Court.

Issue

Can former natural-born Filipinos, now foreign nationals, secure Torrens registration of private land they acquired as Filipinos and whose predecessors possessed the land for the requisite statutory period?

Supreme Court’s Analysis

  1. Torrens System as Confirmation, Not Acquisition
    – Ownership vests by operation of law upon completion of statutory possession (Public Land Act, § 48[b], as amended).
    – Judicial registration merely confirms an already vested title (Municipality of Victorias v. CA; Director of Lands v. IAC).

  2. Tacking of Predecessor’s Possession
    – Respondents’ predecessors occupied alienable and disposable public land since 1937, satisfying the continuous-possession requirement dating from June 12, 1945 (PD 1073).
    – The spouses stepped into their predecessors’ shoes, inheriting the perfected possessory rights.

  3. Private Character of the Land
    – By operation of law, the land ceased to be public domain upon completion of the 30-year possession, becoming private property beyond the Director of Lands’ disposal authority.

  4. Constitutional and Statutory Right of Former Natural-Born Citizens
    – Art. XII, § 8 of the 1987 Constitution permits a natural-born Filipino who lost citizenship to be a transferee of private land, subject to legislative limitations.
    – BP 185 implements that privilege by providing residence-use acquisition up to 1,000 sq m. (urban) or 1 ha

    ...continue reading

    Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
    Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.