Title
Republic vs. Court of Appeals
Case
G.R. No. 108998
Decision Date
Aug 24, 1994
Filipino spouses acquired land, later became Canadian citizens, and sought title registration. SC upheld their vested rights, affirming land as private property despite citizenship change.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 108998)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Parties and Transaction
    • On June 17, 1978, spouses Mario B. Lapina and Flor de Vega (then Filipino citizens) purchased Lots 347 and 348, Cad. s38-D (91.77 sq m) in San Pablo City from Cristeta Dazo Belen.
    • On February 5, 1987, now naturalized Canadian citizens, the spouses filed with the RTC an application for registration of title over those lots as private lands.
  • Lower Court Proceedings
    • The Republic of the Philippines opposed, invoking the Regalian doctrine and questioning respondents’ possession period and foreign nationality.
    • RTC Branch XXXI granted the application, confirming respondents’ title and directing issuance of a decree of registration with an easement annotation.
    • The Court of Appeals affirmed, holding (a) the spouses acquired ownership in 1978 while Filipino, (b) Torrens registration merely confirms, not confers, title, and (c) their predecessors-in-interest had possessed the land since at least 1937, satisfying PD 1529/CA 141.
  • Petition for Review
    • The Republic sought nullification before the Supreme Court, arguing the land remained public until registration, respondents lacked required possession since June 12, 1945, and foreign nationals cannot register private land without complying with BP 185.

Issues:

  • Whether spouses Mario B. Lapina and Flor de Vega, now Canadian citizens but natural-born Filipinos at the time of purchase, may apply for Torrens registration of private land they acquired in 1978.
  • Whether the possession by respondents and their predecessors-in-interest met the requirements of CA 141/PD 1529 to convert alienable public land into private property.
  • Whether BP 185’s limitations and documentary requirements for former Filipino citizens turned foreigners apply to the judicial confirmation stage.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.