Title
Reagan vs. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Case
G.R. No. L-26379
Decision Date
Dec 27, 1969
A U.S. citizen sold a tax-free imported car at Clark Air Base, claiming the sale occurred on "foreign soil" exempt from Philippine taxation. The Supreme Court ruled Clark Air Base is Philippine territory, affirming the income tax liability.

Case Summary (G.R. No. L-26379)

Facts

– July 7, 1959: Reagan assigned to Clark Air Base, Pampanga.
– April 22, 1960: He imported a 1960 Cadillac tax-free (landed cost US$6,443.83).
– July 11, 1960: With Base Commander’s permit, he sold the vehicle for US$6,600 to Pfc. Willie Johnson, Jr., at Clark Air Base. Johnson immediately resold it in Manila for ₱32,000.
– Post-transaction: The Commissioner computed taxable gain of ₱17,912.34 and tax due of ₱2,979.00. Reagan paid under protest and sought refund, then filed before the Court of Tax Appeals (CTA).
– May 12, 1966: CTA denied the refund, holding the sale taxable. Reagan appealed to the Supreme Court.

Issue

Whether a sale of personal property effected within the leased U.S. military base in the Philippines occurs on “foreign soil” and is therefore beyond Philippine taxing jurisdiction.

Applicable Law

– 1935 Philippine Constitution (in force in 1969) – Supreme sovereignty and territorial jurisdiction.
– National Internal Revenue Code (Section 34 on income tax computation; Section 186 on sales tax).
– Military Bases Agreement of 1947 (Act XII, exemption of certain U.S. nationals from Philippine income tax except on Philippine‐source income).
– Precedents on territorial sovereignty and obiter dicta (Schooner Exchange v. M’Faddon; Brown v. Duchesne; Co Po v. CIR; Saura Import & Export Co. v. Meer).

Court’s Ruling

The Supreme Court affirmed the CTA decision. The automobile sale occurred within Philippine territory and Reagan remained liable for the resulting income tax.

Rationale

  1. Sovereignty over leased military bases remains with the Philippines unless expressly limited by treaty.
  2. The Military Bases Agreement grants the U.S. certain jurisdiction by comity but does not convert base areas into foreign territory or remove Philippine power to tax transactions within them.
  3. Prior references to bases as “foreign soil” were mere legal fictions or obiter dicta, intended to prevent tax evasion, and cannot override the clear terms of constitutional sovereignty and the Agreement.
  4. The exemption claus

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources. AI digests are study aids only—use responsibly.