Case Digest (G.R. No. L-26379) Core Legal Reasoning Model
Core Legal Reasoning Model
Facts:
In William C. Reagan vs. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, petitioner Reagan, a United States citizen employed by Bendix Radio to assist the U.S. Air Force, was stationed at Clark Air Base, Pampanga, from July 7, 1959. On April 22, 1960, he imported tax-free a 1960 Cadillac valued at USD 6,443.83. On July 11, 1960, with approval from the Base Commander (on condition the buyer be a U.S. service member or U.S. citizen employed on U.S. bases), he sold the Cadillac for USD 6,600 to Pfc. Willie Johnson, Jr. at Clark Air Base. Johnson then sold the vehicle for ₱32,000 in Manila. The Commissioner assessed petitioner’s net gain at ₱17,912.34 and imposed an income tax of ₱2,979.00, which Reagan paid under protest and later sought refunded. The Court of Tax Appeals found the assessment lawful and denied the refund. Dissatisfied, Reagan appealed to the Supreme Court. Case Digest (G.R. No. L-26379) Expanded Legal Reasoning Model
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model
Facts:
- Background and importation
- Petitioner William C. Reagan, a U.S. citizen employed by Bendix Radio (providing technical assistance to the U.S. Air Force), was stationed at Clark Air Base, Philippines, from July 7, 1959.
- On April 22, 1960, he imported a tax-free 1960 Cadillac with accessories, landed cost $6,443.83.
- Sale transaction and downstream sale
- On July 11, 1960, petitioner obtained the Base Commander’s permit to sell the Cadillac only to U.S. Armed Forces members or U.S. citizens employed on U.S. bases in the Philippines.
- That same day, at Clark Air Base, he sold the car to Pfc. Willie Johnson Jr. (U.S. Marine Corps) for $6,600; Johnson immediately resold it in Manila to Fred Meneses for ₱32,000.
- Tax assessment and proceedings
- The Commissioner of Internal Revenue computed petitioner’s net gain from the sale as ₱17,912.34 and assessed income tax of ₱2,979.
- Petitioner paid the tax, sought a refund administratively, then filed a petition in the Court of Tax Appeals (CTA) contending the base was “foreign soil” and beyond Philippine taxing jurisdiction.
- The CTA denied the refund, holding the sale occurred on Philippine territory and the tax assessment was valid.
Issues:
- Whether the sale of petitioner’s automobile at Clark Air Base occurred outside Philippine territory for purposes of income taxation.
- Whether petitioner’s gain from that sale is exempt from Philippine income tax.
Ruling:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Ratio:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Doctrine:
- (Subscriber-Only)