Title
People vs. Velasco
Case
G.R. No. 190318
Decision Date
Nov 27, 2013
Accused-appellant convicted of raping stepdaughter; alibi rejected, victim's testimony deemed credible, damages modified.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 190318)

Background of Charges

Roberto Velasco faced multiple charges consisting of three counts of rape and one count of acts of lasciviousness. The alleged offenses were based on the accusations made by his stepdaughter, referred to as Lisa, who was a minor at the time of the incidents. The charges were filed under the Revised Penal Code, particularly Article 266-A concerning rape and Article 336 concerning acts of lasciviousness.

Details of Allegations

The Information in Criminal Cases outlined that, on three occasions—December 27, 28, and 29, 2001—Velasco allegedly raped his minor stepdaughter through force and intimidation while they were alone at their residence in Malolos, Bulacan. In a separate incident on December 21, 2002, he was accused of committing acts of lasciviousness, which involved inappropriate touching against her will. The reported incidents occurred while the mother and brother of Lisa were absent from the house.

Trial Proceedings and Verdicts

Velasco was arraigned and pleaded not guilty to all charges. During the trial, the prosecution presented Lisa’s testimony alongside a medico-legal report affirming her non-virgin state as evidence of sexual assault. Conversely, the defense argued that Velasco had been at work during the times of the alleged incidents and contended that the accusations were fabricated due to familial conflict.

Court of First Instance Findings

The Regional Trial Court found Velasco guilty beyond reasonable doubt and sentenced him to reclusion perpetua for each of the three counts of rape and imposed a prison term for the acts of lasciviousness. It also mandated him to pay damages to the victim.

Appeal to the Court of Appeals

Velasco's conviction was challenged before the Court of Appeals, which affirmed the lower court's decision but modified the penalties regarding civil indemnities and damages awarded to Lisa. The appellate court underscored the credibility of Lisa’s testimony while also addressing the legal nuances surrounding the qualifications needed for the imposition of penalties.

Grounds for Appeal

Velasco raised several arguments on appeal, primarily questioning the legitimacy of his arrest, asserting a violation of his rights under Republic Act No. 7438, and challenging the credibility of the victim's testimony. He further claimed that the prosecution failed to establish his guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

Assessment of Arrest and Procedural Validity

The Supreme Court ruled that the irregularities in Velasco’s warrantless arrest, raised after his plea, did not invalidate the subsequent trial and judgment. It emphasized that challenges to an arrest must be made prior to entering a plea, otherwise, such objections are considered waived.

Evaluation of Testimonies and Evidence

The Court maintained that the victim’s testimony alone could suffice for a rape conviction when credible, as established

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.