Title
People vs. Velasco
Case
G.R. No. 190318
Decision Date
Nov 27, 2013
Accused-appellant convicted of raping stepdaughter; alibi rejected, victim's testimony deemed credible, damages modified.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 190318)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Overview of the Case
    • The case involves the People of the Philippines versus Roberto Velasco, who was charged with three counts of rape and one count of acts of lasciviousness.
    • The charges were filed under distinct criminal cases: Criminal Cases Nos. 3580-M-2002, 3581-M-2002, and 145-M-2003 (rape) and Criminal Case No. 3579-M-2002 (acts of lasciviousness).
    • The incidents involved allegations that Velasco, the live-in partner of the victim’s mother, used his influence and threatened the minor victim, identified as [Lisa], during incidents spanning December 2001 and December 2002.
  • Alleged Criminal Acts and Chronology
    • Rape Incidents
      • On December 27, 2001, Velasco allegedly raped his stepdaughter [Lisa] at around 11:00 a.m. while she was watching television in the sala.
      • On December 28, 2001, a similar act was committed in the same municipality when Velasco again removed his and the victim’s garments before assaulting her.
      • On December 29, 2001, a third incident of rape occurred under similar circumstances with the victim being alone with Velasco after other family members had left the house.
    • Charge of Acts of Lasciviousness
      • On December 21, 2002, Velasco was alleged to have attempted an unauthorized sexual assault by kissing and touching [Lisa]’s private parts while she was asleep.
      • This act was characterized by the use of force and intimidation and was distinguished from the rape incidents by its particular circumstances and the degree of physical penetration.
  • Proceedings and Evidence Presented at Trial
    • Trial Court Proceedings
      • The Regional Trial Court of Malolos, Bulacan, Branch 13 found Velasco guilty beyond reasonable doubt on all counts—three for rape and one for acts of lasciviousness.
      • The evidentiary record included the testimony of the victim, a medico-legal report by Dr. Richard Ivan Viray, and other corroborative evidence.
      • The victim’s testimony was recounted in detail including her description of the repeated assaults, the physical evidence (healed hymenal lacerations), and the threats employed by Velasco.
    • Defense Evidence and Alibi
      • Velasco presented an alibi stating that he was working as a mason at a construction site in Barangay Caingin, Malolos, during the time of the alleged acts.
      • His nephew, Roderick Palconet, was offered as a corroborating witness, although his testimony was later critiqued for lack of disinterestedness and proximity to Velasco.
    • Consolidation of Cases
      • Subsequent to pre-trial, the various criminal cases were consolidated, and joint hearings were conducted, leading to a unified decision on the merits.
      • The trial court imposed reclusion perpetua for each rape count and an indeterminate prison term for the charge of acts of lasciviousness, along with award of damages to the victim.
  • Appellate Proceedings and Assignment of Errors
    • Velasco appealed the decision, raising several assignments of error including:
      • Allegation that his warrantless arrest was illegal and that his rights under Republic Act No. 7438 were violated.
      • Contentions regarding the probative value and credibility of the victim’s testimony.
      • Disputes that the evidence was insufficient to prove his guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
    • The Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court’s decision with modifications, which included adjustments in the amounts of exemplary and moral damages awarded.
    • A correction was noted regarding the misattribution of criminal case numbers corresponding to the specific charges.

Issues:

  • On the Legality of Arrest Procedures
    • Whether Velasco’s warrantless arrest was conducted in accordance with the law or if it violated his rights under Republic Act No. 7438.
    • Whether the defense sufficiently raised the issue of the arrest’s irregularity in a timely manner prior to his arraignment, given established jurisprudence on waiver of such objections.
  • On the Sufficiency and Credibility of the Evidence
    • Whether the victim’s testimony, despite alleged inconsistencies and delays in reporting, was credible, convincing, and consistent with typical human behavior under trauma.
    • Whether the medical evidence supporting the physical findings (e.g., healed hymenal lacerations and non-virgin state) was essential or determinative in establishing the occurrence of rape.
    • Whether the defense’s alibi, corroborated by a close relative, carried sufficient weight or was undermined by issues of its credibility and disinterest.
    • Whether any discrepancies in the victim’s account were substantial enough to create reasonable doubt regarding Velasco’s guilt.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.