Title
People vs. Santiano
Case
G.R. No. 123979
Decision Date
Dec 3, 1998
A man was abducted, mauled, and murdered after a prior arrest for alleged drug possession; appellants convicted of kidnapping, not murder.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 176951)

Key Dates

Commission of Offense: December 27, 1993 (evening abduction)
Discovery of Victim’s Body: December 28, 1993 (morning, Barangay Palestina, Pili, Camarines Sur)
Decision Date: December 3, 1998 (invoking the 1987 Constitution)

Applicable Law

Revised Penal Code, Article 267 (Kidnapping and Serious Illegal Detention) and Article 248 (Murder)

Prosecution’s Factual Narrative

On December 27, 1993, between 6:00 p.m. and 7:00 p.m., the victim obtained permission to buy viand outside Naga City Jail. Upon emerging from a PNP store adjacent to the jail, he was accosted by Santiano and Sandigan, forcibly brought to the nearby NARCOM office, and mauled by Santiano—who wrapped a handkerchief around his fists—while Pillueta acted as lookout. Chanco arrived in his trimobile, into which the victim was placed alongside Santiano and Pillueta. The three men drove toward Barangay Palestina, Pili. The following morning, the victim’s body, bearing multiple gunshot wounds to the chest and other fatal injuries, was discovered in a canal.

Defense Version

The accused-appellants maintained that on the evening in question they merely gathered socially: Sandigan, Santiano, and Chanco met for a snack, proceeded to the NARCOM office where Pillueta was present, then dispersed separately. Santiano claimed he spent the remainder of the evening attending to his pregnant wife in Milaor, while Pillueta and colleagues went to a music lounge. They denied ever seeing or abducting the victim.

Autopsy Findings

Dr. Thomas S. Gonzales performed the post-mortem and identified:

  • Multiple contusions and lacerations on the head and ear
  • A puncture wound in the neck
  • A fatal gunshot wound entering the right second intercostal space, traversing the heart and left lung, lodging in the left subscapular area
  • Cause of death: internal hemorrhage secondary to the gunshot wound

Trial Court Ruling

The Regional Trial Court found all four accused guilty of kidnapping under Article 267, sentencing each to reclusion perpetua and ordering civil indemnity of ₱50,000 to the heirs. The court concluded that the evidence established unlawful deprivation of liberty with serious physical injury culminating in death; it did not reach the murder component due to certain evidentiary gaps.

Issues on Appeal

  1. Whether the indictment improperly charged “kidnapping with murder” and thus rendered the kidnapping conviction untenable if the murder element failed.
  2. Whether the information was legally sufficient to apprize the accused of the kidnapping charge.
  3. Whether proof of kidnapping alone justified conviction absent proof of murder.

Adequacy of the Information

The Supreme Court held that the amended information plainly charged a complex crime—kidnapping under Article 267 and murder under Article 248—and satisfied the requirement to state statutory designations and essential factual allegations. No objection to its sufficiency was raised at trial; hence

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.