Title
People vs. Salafranca y Bello
Case
G.R. No. 173476
Decision Date
Feb 22, 2012
Johnny Bolanon was fatally stabbed in 1993; his dying declaration and eyewitness testimony identified Rodrigo Salafranca as the assailant. After evading arrest for a decade, Salafranca was convicted of murder, with treachery affirmed, and civil damages awarded to Bolanon’s heirs.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 233479)

Petitioner

People of the Philippines

Respondent

Rodrigo Salafranca y Bello

Key Dates

• July 31, 1993 – Stabbing incident
• September 23, 2004 – RTC conviction (Manila, Branch 18)
• November 24, 2005 – CA decision affirming conviction
• February 22, 2012 – Supreme Court decision

Applicable Law

• 1987 Philippine Constitution
• Revised Penal Code, Article 248 (as amended by Republic Act No. 7659) and Article 63
• Rules on Evidence (dying declaration, res gestae exceptions)
• Civil Code (Articles 2206, 2217–2219, 2229–2230)

Facts of the Offense

Shortly after midnight on July 31, 1993, Salafranca stabbed Bolanon near the Del Pan Sports Complex in Binondo. Despite his injury, Bolanon walked to his uncle’s home, who transported him by taxi to the Philippine General Hospital. En route, Bolanon identified Salafranca as his assailant. He died at 2:30 a.m. on the same day. Mendoza, a 13-year-old bystander, witnessed the attack.

Procedural History

Salafranca fled after the stabbing and remained at large until his arrest on April 23, 2003. He was tried for murder before the RTC, which convicted him. The CA affirmed the conviction on November 24, 2005. Salafranca appealed to the Supreme Court.

Trial Court Decision

The RTC found that:
• Salafranca delivered two fatal blows while holding Bolanon by the neck, preventing any defense.
• Mendoza’s eyewitness testimony and Bolanon’s ante-mortem identification to his uncle were credible.
• Treachery attended the killing.
• Salafranca’s flight and inconsistent alibi further supported guilt.
He was sentenced to reclusion perpetua, credited for time served, and ordered to pay P50,000 as death indemnity.

Appellate Court Affirmation

The CA upheld the RTC’s findings, stressing the dying declaration and Mendoza’s positive identification. It rejected the alibi and held that the unexplained flight was highly indicative of guilt.

Standard of Review on Witness Credibility

The Supreme Court emphasized that credibility assessments by the RTC are entitled to great weight. Absent clear misappreciation or omission of evidence, neither the CA nor the Supreme Court may disturb such findings.

Admissibility of Victim’s Ante-Mortem Statement

Bolanon’s identification of his assailant was admissible both as a dying declaration and as part of the res gestae. The requirements were satisfied:
• It concerned the cause and circumstances of death.
• Bolanon was conscious of imminent death (severe chest wound and labored breathing).
• He was competent to testify had he survived.
• Offered in a murder prosecution.

Application of Dying Declaration and Res Gestae Exceptions

The declaration was made within three hours of the stabbing during transport to the hospital. It was spontaneous, contemporaneous with the startling event, and could not have been contrived.

Treachery Qualification

Mendoza’s unchallenged account—attack from behind, neck encirclement, unexpected blows—met the defin






...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.