Title
People vs. Salafranca y Bello
Case
G.R. No. 173476
Decision Date
Feb 22, 2012
Johnny Bolanon was fatally stabbed in 1993; his dying declaration and eyewitness testimony identified Rodrigo Salafranca as the assailant. After evading arrest for a decade, Salafranca was convicted of murder, with treachery affirmed, and civil damages awarded to Bolanon’s heirs.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 173476)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • The stabbing incident
    • On July 31, 1993, past midnight, Johnny Bolanon was fatally stabbed near the Del Pan Sports Complex in Binondo, Manila.
    • The assailant fled immediately after delivering two blows, one to the right subcostal area and another below the left nipple.
  • Rescue and dying declaration
    • Despite his wounds, Bolanon walked to his uncle Rodolfo B. Estaño’s house to seek help.
    • On the way by taxicab to the Philippine General Hospital, Bolanon told Estaño that Rodrigo Salafranca y Bello was his attacker.
    • Bolanon died at 2:30 a.m. in the emergency room.
  • Witness identification and arrest
    • Thirteen-year-old Augusto Mendoza witnessed the attack, positively identifying Salafranca as the culprit.
    • Salafranca evaded arrest until April 23, 2003, when he was detained at the Manila City Jail.
  • Trial court and appellate proceedings
    • The Regional Trial Court (RTC) convicted Salafranca of murder with the qualifying aggravating circumstance of treachery and sentenced him to reclusion perpetua.
    • The Court of Appeals (CA) affirmed the conviction and the award of ₱50,000 death indemnity.
    • Salafranca appealed to the Supreme Court, challenging witness credibility and the sufficiency of evidence.

Issues:

  • Whether Bolanon’s ante-mortem statements are admissible as a dying declaration or part of the res gestae.
  • Whether the identification by Mendoza and Bolanon’s declaration to Estaño suffice to prove Salafranca’s guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
  • Whether the award of civil damages should be limited to the ₱50,000 death indemnity or expanded to include moral, temperate, and exemplary damages.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.