Title
People vs. Recto y Robea
Case
G.R. No. 129069
Decision Date
Oct 17, 2001
Julio Recto shot and killed barangay officials during a land dispute confrontation, leading to convictions for homicide and assault, with penalties adjusted by the Supreme Court.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 171655)

Key Dates

  • April 18, 1994: Incident date
  • September 22 & October 18, 1994: Informations filed
  • April 2, 1997: RTC conviction and sentencing
  • October 17, 2001: Supreme Court decision

Applicable Law

  • 1987 Philippine Constitution
  • Revised Penal Code
    • Art. 11 (Self-defense and defense of relatives)
    • Arts. 148, 152 (Direct assault)
    • Art. 249 (Homicide)
    • Art. 48 (Complex crimes), Art. 51 (Penalty reduction)
    • Art. 52 (Agents of authority)
  • Indeterminate Sentence Law

Facts

  • Barangay officials and police investigated a broken padlock and stolen palay at the Rance bodega.
  • Appellant and six companions arrived; tension escalated when Dante Regis threw a piece of wood.
  • Barangay Captain Orbe and Kagawad Macalipay attempted to pacify the group.
  • Appellant drew a homemade shotgun (“pugakang”) and fatally shot Macalipay and Santos; he also wounded Melchor Recto and Orbe.
  • There was no unlawful aggression by the victims to justify self-defense.

Procedural History

  • RTC: Five cases against appellant—Nos. 1970 & 1971 (direct assault with frustrated homicide), No. 1972 (direct assault with murder), No. 1973 (homicide), No. 1975 (illegal firearm possession).
  • RTC Decision (April 2, 1997):
    • Nos. 1970 & 1971: Qualified direct assault with frustrated homicide, prision mayor (8y1d–10y1d)
    • No. 1972: Qualified direct assault with murder, death penalty + ₱50,000 indemnity
    • No. 1973: Homicide, reclusion temporal (8y1d–13y9m10d) + ₱50,000 indemnity
    • Exhibits confiscated; penalties to run successively
  • Automatic Supreme Court review due to imposition of death penalty

Issues on Appeal

  1. Whether appellant validly invoked self-defense and defense of a relative
  2. Whether treachery properly qualified the murder charge
  3. Correct classification of each offense and appropriate penalties

Legal Analysis

  • Self-defense and defense of a relative require proof of unlawful aggression, necessity of means, and absence of provocation. No such aggression occurred; victims were unarmed or retreating.
  • Direct assault against agents of authority applies only if the victim was on duty or attacked on occasion of duty.
    • Melchor Recto (tanod) was not performing official duties—attack on him is attempted homicide, not direct assault.
    • Percival Orbe (barangay captain) was on duty—attack is qualified direct assault with attempted homicide.
  • Treachery demands a deliberate, calculated mode of attack that leaves the victim defenseless. Here, the killing of Macalipay was sudden, without premeditation or deliberate exploitation of vulnerability. The correct offense is homicide—qualified direct assault with homicide by weapon.

Disposition

  • Criminal Case No. 1970: Convicted of attempted homicide; sentenced under the Indeterminate Sentence Law to 4 months arresto mayor (minimum) to 4 years 2 months prision correccional (maximum).
  • No. 1971: Convicted of qualified dire
...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.