Title
People vs. Recto y Robea
Case
G.R. No. 129069
Decision Date
Oct 17, 2001
Julio Recto shot and killed barangay officials during a land dispute confrontation, leading to convictions for homicide and assault, with penalties adjusted by the Supreme Court.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 150135)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Background of the Incident
    • On April 18, 1994, at about 5:00 PM in Barangay Ambulong, Magdiwang, Romblon, Barangay Captain Percival Orbe, Barangay Kagawad Antonio Macalipay, and Barangay Tanod Melchor Recto (appellant’s cousin) investigated a broken padlock and stolen palay at the Rance couple’s bodega. SPO4 Rafol and SPO1 Male also made inquiries.
    • Melchor Recto arrived and remained at the scene at Orbe’s request, though he was off duty and on his way home.
  • Confrontation and Shooting
    • Julio Recto (appellant) arrived with six companions (including Cornelio Regis Jr., Dante Regis, Melver Relox). Dante Regis threw wood toward the group; Orbe and Macalipay attempted to pacify them.
    • Appellant drew a homemade shotgun (“pugakang”) and shot Macalipay at close range, killing him; he then shot and killed Emiliano “Renato” Santos in a subsequent exchange. He also fired at Orbe and Melchor Recto, wounding both as they fled.
  • Proceedings Below
    • Appellant was arraigned on five Informations: two for direct assault with frustrated homicide (Criminal Cases 1970 & 1971), one for direct assault with murder (1972), one for homicide (1973), and one for illegal possession of firearm (1975). He pleaded not guilty.
    • The Regional Trial Court convicted him on the first four counts: two counts of qualified direct assault with frustrated homicide, one count of qualified direct assault with murder (sentenced to death), and one count of homicide; it also ordered confiscation of the firearms.

Issues:

  • Whether appellant validly invoked self-defense or defense of a relative.
  • Whether the elements of qualified direct assault, treachery, and frustrated homicide were correctly applied.
  • Whether treachery existed in the killing of Antonio Macalipay.
  • Whether the crimes and penalties imposed by the trial court should be modified.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.