Title
People vs. Paycana, Jr.
Case
G.R. No. 179035
Decision Date
Apr 16, 2008
Appellant convicted of parricide with unintentional abortion after stabbing pregnant wife 14 times; self-defense claim rejected due to lack of evidence.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 179035)

Petitioner

Jesus Paycana Jr.

Respondent

The People of the Philippines

Key Dates

• November 26, 2002 – Date of stabbing incident
• January–June 2004 – Trial-level testimonies and proceedings
• April 14, 2005 – RTC decision convicting appellant
• May 30, 2007 – Court of Appeals affirmation (modified penalty)
• June 14, 2007 – Notice of appeal filed with Court of Appeals
• April 16, 2008 – Supreme Court promulgation

Applicable Law

• 1987 Philippine Constitution
• Revised Penal Code:
 – Article 11 (Justifying circumstances: self-defense)
 – Article 246 (Parricide)
 – Article 257 (Unintentional abortion)
 – Article 48 (Complex crimes)
• Republic Act No. 9346 (Abolition of death penalty)
• Rules of Criminal Procedure (Rule 122 on automatic appeals in death penalty cases)
• Civil Code provisions on indemnity and damages

Facts

  1. Appellant admitted during pre-trial that Lilybeth was his legitimate spouse.
  2. On the morning of November 26, 2002, appellant returned from work armed with a kitchen knife and a bolo. Lilybeth was preparing their children for school.
  3. For reasons undisclosed, appellant stabbed his wife fourteen times, causing her immediate death and termination of the seven-month fetus.
  4. Angelina witnessed the attack through a window, saw her father strangle and stab her mother, and cried for him to stop.
  5. Tito heard Lilybeth’s screams, arrived at the scene, saw her prostrate and trembling, and observed appellant armed and standing over the victim.
  6. Appellant claimed self-defense, alleging that Lilybeth attacked him first with the knife, that he wrested it from her, and then stabbed her in return; he professed not to recall the exact number of wounds due to dizziness and bleeding.

Issue

Whether the evidence and circumstances warranted recognition of the justifying circumstance of self-defense in appellant’s favor.

Trial Court Ruling

The RTC found appellant guilty beyond reasonable doubt of the complex crime of parricide with unintentional abortion. It imposed the maximum penalty of death (later commuted to reclusion perpetua) and awarded civil indemnity (₱50,000), moral damages (₱50,000), and exemplary damages (₱25,000) to the heirs of Lilybeth.

Court of Appeals Ruling

Affirmed the RTC’s conviction but modified the penalty from death to reclusion perpetua pursuant to RA 9346. It held that appellant failed to prove self-defense by clear and convincing evidence and that eyewitness and medical testimony negated any lawful aggression by the victim.

Supreme Court Analysis

  1. Self-defense is a purely factual matter, with the burden of proof on the accused to establish:
    a. Unlawful aggression by the victim;
    b. Reasonable necessity of the means employed; and
    c. Absence of sufficient provocation by the defender (RPC Art. 11).
  2. Eyewitness testimony of Angelina (age 15), corroborated by Tito and medical findings, established that appellant was the initial aggressor. His account of being stabbed first was undermined by:
    • Inconsistent testimony regarding the number and nature of his wounds (a defense witness conceded they could be self-inflicted superficial cuts).
    • Physical evidence of fourteen stab wounds indicating a deliberate killing rather than a defensive reaction.
  3. Unlawful aggression by the victim was not proven. Even if Lilybeth had stabbed appellant once, the continuation and multiplicity of wounds negate reasonable necessity.
  4. The unborn fetus’s death qualified as unintentional abortion under Article 257: violence unintentionally exerted on a pregnant woman re

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.