Title
People vs. Paycana, Jr.
Case
G.R. No. 179035
Decision Date
Apr 16, 2008
Appellant convicted of parricide with unintentional abortion after stabbing pregnant wife 14 times; self-defense claim rejected due to lack of evidence.

Case Digest (A.M. No. P-21-4100)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Pre-trial and charges
    • Appellant Jesus Paycana Jr. was charged before the RTC of Iriga City, Branch 37, with the complex crime of parricide with unintentional abortion; he pleaded not guilty but admitted that the victim, Lilybeth Balandra-Paycana, was his legitimate wife.
    • He claimed self-defense, alleging that on 25 November 2002 his wife attacked him first with a knife, which he wrested from her before stabbing her.
  • Facts of the killing
    • On 26 November 2002 at around 6:30 AM, appellant returned home armed with a kitchen knife, a bolo, and a sharpener; for reasons known only to him, he stabbed his seven-month pregnant wife 14 times, causing her immediate death and the death of the fetus.
    • Eyewitnesses:
      • Eldest daughter Angelina saw her father strangle and stab her mother despite her pleas.
      • Victim’s father Tito heard screams, saw appellant armed and the victim prostrate with trembling feet; Angelina then told Tito by the window that appellant had stabbed her mother.
      • Dr. Stephen Beltran conducted the autopsy confirming multiple fatal stab wounds; Santiago Magistrado Jr. embalmed the body and removed the fetus.
  • Procedural history
    • The RTC convicted appellant on 14 April 2005 and imposed the death penalty, civil indemnity, moral and exemplary damages.
    • The Court of Appeals denied his appeal on 30 May 2007, commuted the penalty of death to reclusion perpetua under R.A. 9346, and affirmed civil liabilities. Appellant’s appeal to the Supreme Court followed.

Issues:

  • Whether appellant proved the justifying circumstance of self-defense.
  • Whether the factual findings on unlawful aggression and necessity of means should be disturbed.
  • Whether the killing constitutes a complex crime of parricide with unintentional abortion.
  • Whether the penalty of reclusion perpetua and civil liabilities are proper under the RPC and R.A. 9346.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.