Title
People vs. Oyanib y Mendoza
Case
G.R. No. 130634-35
Decision Date
Mar 12, 2001
Manolito, upon catching his wife and paramour in adultery, killed them in a fit of passion. The Supreme Court ruled his actions justified under Article 247, sentencing him to destierro.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 110120)

Petitioner

Manolito Oyanib y Mendoza, convicted of homicide (Crim. Case No. II-6012) and parricide (Crim. Case No. II-6018) by the Regional Trial Court of Iligan City

Respondent

People of the Philippines

Key Dates

– Offenses committed: September 4, 1995
– Informations filed and surrender: September 11, 1995
– Arraignment: January 17, 1996
– Trial court decision: May 26, 1997
– Notice of appeal filed: June 17, 1997
– Supreme Court decision: March 12, 2001

Applicable Law

– Revised Penal Code (Articles 246, 247, 248 on parricide, exceptional circumstances privilege, and homicide)
– Republic Act No. 7659 (imposing reclusion perpetua for parricide)
– Indeterminate Sentence Law
– 1987 Philippine Constitution

Factual Background

Manolito and Tita married in 1979 and separated in 1994; Manolito retained custody of their two children. Tita moved to a second-floor rented room at Edgardo Lladas’s house in Iligan City. On the evening of September 4, 1995, Manolito approached Tita’s rented room to request her attendance at a school meeting concerning their son. He heard sounds of sexual activity, pried open the door with a hunting knife, and discovered Tita and Jesus Esquierdo in flagrante delicto. A physical altercation ensued: Jesus kicked Manolito, who then stabbed Jesus multiple times. Tita attacked Manolito with a broken bottle, prompting Manolito to stab her repeatedly. Tita died en route to the hospital; Jesus died at the scene. Manolito fled but surrendered the next day upon public broadcast.

Procedural History

The Iligan City Prosecutor filed separate informations charging Manolito with:

  1. Murder of Jesus Esquierdo under Article 248, aggravated by evident premeditation (Crim. Case No. II-6012)
  2. Parricide of Tita Oyanib under Article 246 (Crim. Case No. II-6018)

The trial court conducted a joint trial. On May 26, 1997, it found Manolito guilty beyond reasonable doubt, applying two mitigating circumstances (passion or obfuscation and voluntary surrender) and imposing:
– Homicide: six months–six years and one day–eight years of imprisonment (indeterminate), P50,000 civil indemnity
– Parricide: reclusion perpetua, P50,000 civil indemnity

Manolito appealed, invoking Article 247 (exceptional circumstances privilege) and contesting the trial court’s factual findings.

Issue

Whether Manolito satisfied the requirements of the exceptional‐circumstances privilege under Article 247 of the Revised Penal Code, which would relieve him of criminal liability for killing his wife and her paramour upon surprising them in the act of sexual intercourse.

Legal Analysis

Article 247 provides an exempting circumstance where a legally married spouse kills the unfaithful spouse (and paramour) during or immediately after catching them in flagrante delicto, provided the offended spouse did not consent to the infidelity nor facilitate it. The accused bears the burden of proving, by clear and convincing evidence, that:

  1. He surprised his spouse committing sexual intercourse with another
  2. The killing occurred in the act or immediately thereafter
  3. He did not condone or facilitate his spouse’s infidelity

The Court found all three elements satisfied:
– Manolito indisputably chanced upon Tita and Jesus in the act.
– He stabbed th

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.