Title
People vs. Oyanib y Mendoza
Case
G.R. No. 130634-35
Decision Date
Mar 12, 2001
Manolito, upon catching his wife and paramour in adultery, killed them in a fit of passion. The Supreme Court ruled his actions justified under Article 247, sentencing him to destierro.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 130634-35)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Parties and charges
    • Manolito Oyanib y Mendoza (accused-appellant) charged with:
      • Criminal Case No. II-6012 – Murder of Jesus Esquierdo under Article 248 RPC with evident premeditation
      • Criminal Case No. II-6018 – Parricide of his wife, Tita T. Oyanib, under Article 246 RPC with evident premeditation
    • Informations filed on September 4, 1995; accused voluntarily surrendered and pleaded not guilty
  • Marital background and separation
    • Married since February 3, 1979, with two children; separated in 1994 due to marital differences
    • Tita rented second‐floor room of Edgardo Lladas’s house; Manolito retained custody of children
  • Events of September 4–5, 1995
    • Evening of September 4: Manolito received school letter about son, went to Tita’s rented room, heard “sounds of romance,” pried door with knife, found Tita and Jesus in sexual act
    • Accused stabbed Jesus multiple times after being kicked; Tita armed with broken bottle, stabbed Manolito in the arm; in ensuing rage Manolito stabbed Tita multiple times—both victims died
  • Investigation and trial court proceedings
    • Police blotter entry, recovery of the hunting knife, medico-legal examinations confirming fatal stab wounds
    • Joint trial before RTC Branch 02, Iligan City; May 26, 1997 decision found accused guilty of homicide and parricide, imposed indeterminate sentence and reclusion perpetua, awarded civil indemnities
    • Appeal filed June 17, 1997 to Supreme Court, invoking Article 247 RPC (exceptional circumstances)

Issues:

  • Whether accused-appellant proved the essential elements of the exceptional circumstance under Article 247 RPC (surprising spouse in flagrante delicto, killing in the act or immediately thereafter, absence of consent to infidelity) by clear and convincing evidence
  • Whether the trial court erred in denying exempting privilege under Article 247 RPC and in imposing the original penalties

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.