Title
People vs. Garalde
Case
G.R. No. 128622
Decision Date
Dec 14, 2000
Three children, driver, and yayas kidnapped for ransom; kidnappers convicted, one sentenced to death, another to life imprisonment.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 128622)

Criminal Informations and Arraignment

In Criminal Case No. Q-94-58657, the Information accused Garalde and her husband Roque Garalde of violation of Presidential Decree No. 1866 (as amended) for alleged illegal possession of firearms and ammunition. In Criminal Case No. Q-94-58658, the Information charged accused-appellants, together with Roque Garalde and unidentified John Does, with Kidnapping and Serious Illegal Detention under Article 267 of the Revised Penal Code, as amended by Republic Act No. 7659, alleging that the kidnapping was committed for the purpose of extorting ransom.

Only accused-appellants were arraigned. Both entered a plea of not guilty. A joint trial of the two cases ensued.

Factual Background: The Abduction on 9 August 1994

The prosecution presented witnesses including Kathryn “Kata” Bellosillo, Dianita Bebita, Paolo Bellosillo, and C/Insp. Michael Ray Aquino. Their testimonies established that on 9 August 1994, at about 6:45 a.m., minors Paolo (thirteen years old), John (eight years old), and Nino (eleven years old), students at the Ateneo de Manila University, were riding a Toyota Lite Ace van driven by family driver Antonio Paquera. With them were yayas Dianita Bebita and Janidy Dumagpi.

While the van approached the corner of Scouts Limbaga and Ybardolaza Streets in Quezon City, a taxi abruptly bumped the right side of the van, causing it to stop. Three men then alighted from the taxi. One poked a gun at Dianita and ordered her not to create a scene. The men forced entry into the van and blindfolded all the passengers. Dianita and Antonio were ordered to move to the back portion of the van, after which one of the men took over the wheel and drove away.

The victims were eventually brought to a house where they were kept inside a room. The abduction affected the victims’ liberty for nine days, with Dianita and Janidy released earlier than Paolo, John, and Nino.

Ransom Demands and Communications

On 9 August 1994, Kathryn Bellosillo, then in a hospital watching over her sick daughter, received a call from a family member who informed her that the boys were kidnapped and that ransom was demanded. Kathryn confirmed with the school principal that the children were missing from class.

In the evening, Kathryn received another call from a kidnapper who demanded ten million pesos (P10,000,00.00) and threatened harm if the demand was not met. Through subsequent communications, the kidnappers—through a caller identifying himself as “Mang Ernesto”—repeatedly asked Kathryn whether the money was ready.

On 12 August 1994, Kathryn was able to speak with Paolo by telephone. Paolo begged his mother to give the kidnappers the money so they could return home. Kathryn attempted to prolong the conversation so the Presidential Anti-Crime Commission (PACC) could trace the call.

Following negotiations, the ransom was reduced to P410,000.00 cash and several pieces of jewelry valued at P80,000.00.

Investigation and Tracking of the Suspects’ Vehicle

Immediately after the kidnapping was reported, General Panfilo Lacson of the PACC dispatched C/Insp. Michael Ray Aquino and other agents. At about 10:00 a.m. on 9 August 1994, they went to Scout Limbaga and learned from vendors and bystanders that the Lite Ace van had been cut off by a taxi, followed by a blue Toyota Corolla bearing a commemorative plate ALMA.

Using “back-tracking,” the PACC agents separated into teams to trace probable routes. Aquino’s team sighted the blue Toyota Corolla with plate number TCJ 185 along Commonwealth Avenue, with at least four suspicious passengers. The agents tailed the vehicle until it stopped at a house on Evangeline Pascual St., B.F. Resort Village, Las Pinas, owned by Atty. Manzano.

After contacting the LTO regarding vehicle registration, Aquino was informed that the Toyota Corolla with plate number TCJ-185 was registered under the name of accused-appellant Alma Garalde, with address at U.P. BLISS, Quezon City. It was also learned that she no longer resided at that address but at Frankville Subdivision, Novaliches, Quezon City.

When Kathryn later spoke to Paolo, the call was traced to the same Las Pinas house. The PACC men manning the house confirmed that the Toyota Corolla had arrived with four men and a boy presumably Paolo. The kidnapper later arranged release logistics through telephone instructions.

Releases During the Captivity and Final Release on 18 August 1994

In the early dawn of 16 August 1994, the kidnappers released Dianita, who was directed to go home to secure and deliver the ransom. Dianita arrived crying and told Kathryn that she was instructed to collect the ransom money and deliver it to the kidnappers.

Kathryn subsequently received calls from “Mang Ernesto” instructing how ransom payment should be made. Per instruction, Dianita drove the Lite Ace van to East Avenue Medical Center between 7:30 a.m. and 8:30 a.m. while carrying the P410,000.00 cash and the jewelry. She left the engine running and blindfolded herself. After someone entered and confirmed the money’s presence, the van moved. It stopped again where confirmation occurred, after which Dianita was told they were taking her to the children. The kidnappers eventually left.

Dianita removed her blindfold and realized they were in Novaliches. She waited for the children until 1:00 p.m., but they never arrived. She called Kathryn, and the family driver fetched her from Novaliches.

The PACC had also planned monitoring. Authorities observed the Toyota Corolla at East Avenue Medical Center and tailed both vehicles after they left. During surveillance, the vehicles were eventually lost at around 11:30 a.m. in Congressional Avenue, Quezon City.

On 17 August 1994, the PACC conducted investigation in Frankville Subdivision, Novaliches, and located the same Toyota Corolla registered as TCJ-185 at No. 45 Frankville Subdivision. Aquino and his team saw several men entering and exiting the house, including a man later identified as Roque Garalde. The PACC refrained from acting then to avoid endangering the victims.

At dawn of 18 August 1994, after nine days, Paolo, John, and Nino—together with the family driver Antonio Paquera—were released. They were blindfolded, kept unaware of route, and released after being instructed to count from one to twenty before removing blindfolds. They later hailed a taxi and returned to the family, leading to a tearful reunion.

Search Warrants, Search of the House, and Evidence Identification

On 19 August 1994, the PACC applied for search warrants, which were issued on the same day by Judge Pablito M. Rojas, RTC, Branch 160 of Pasig City. The warrants authorized the search of the residence of Roque and Alma Garalde at No. 45 Frankville Subdivision, Novaliches, Quezon City, in connection with the crimes of kidnapping with ransom and illegal possession of firearms.

On 20 August 1994, Aquino, together with police officers, conducted the search, resulting in recovery of the Toyota Corolla TCJ-185, firearms, ammunition, and cellular phones, as well as photographs. Firearms and ammunition were found in a room on the second floor. The search was also recorded on video by PACC operatives.

Verification with the Firearms and Explosives Unit in Camp Crame showed that neither Roque nor accused-appellant Garalde was a licensed firearms holder. Photographs recovered were shown to the kidnap victims for identification. The victims identified accused-appellant Ibero as one of the abductors.

The PACC operatives also showed the photographs to security guards at B.F. Resort, Las Pinas, where the blue Toyota Corolla earlier arrived; the guards recognized one of the men as accused-appellant Ibero.

Arrest, Line-Up, and In-Court Identification

Accused-appellant Ibero was arrested on 22 August 1994 in Paranaque, at the back of a church. The next day, he was made to stand in a police line-up. He was singled out by the kidnap victims.

The victims later testified at trial, where both Paolo and Dianita positively identified Ibero as one of the abductors. The testimonies also established that Ibero blindfolded the driver Antonio and blindfolded Paolo in the van.

Dianita also positively identified Garalde. She testified that her blindfold was removed on the fifth day of captivity, after which she saw Garalde peep through the door of the room where victims were kept. She heard Garalde instruct: “Itali ninyong mabuti iyan at baka makawala,” referring to Antonio, who was blindfolded and tied.

Paolo further testified that on the fifth day, he heard a woman issue similar cautionary words while still blindfolded. He also testified that when shown a videotape taken by PACC during the search, he recognized the room shown as the same room where they were kept.

Trial Court Disposition

After weighing evidence, the trial court convicted both accused-appellants for kidnapping for ransom and serious illegal detention, with Ibero as principal and Garalde as accomplice. Garalde was acquitted of illegal possession of firearms.

The trial court imposed the maximum penalty of death on Ibero and reclusion perpetua on Garalde, applying the penalty one degree lower for accomplices. It also ordered full credit for Garalde’s preventive imprisonment.

Issues Raised on Appeal

Accused-appellant Ibero argued that the prosecution failed to prove his identity beyond reasonable doubt. He emphasized that Paolo and Dianita were allegedly in shock, nervous, frightened, confused, and dizzy; that the abduction happened quickly; and that they supposedly did not see him during captivity. He also challenged the significance of Roque Garalde’s testimony as to beneficial effect for him.

Accused-appellant Garalde argued, among others, that the prosecution failed to positively identify her, that delay in filing criminal complaints impaired credibility, that prosecution evidence contained inconsistencies and improbabilities, and that denial should have been credited. She also argued that non-flight proved innocenc

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.