Title
Paulmitan vs. Court of Appeals
Case
G.R. No. 61584
Decision Date
Nov 25, 1992
Agatona's heirs disputed ownership of two Negros Occidental lots. SC upheld co-ownership: Juliana and Pascual's heirs each own half of Lot 1091; redemption didn't terminate co-ownership. Petition denied.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 61584)

Facts of Succession and Property

Agatona owned two parcels in Negros Occidental: Lot No. 757 (1,946 m²) under OCT No. RO-8376, and Lot No. 1091 (69,080 m²) under OCT No. RO-11653. Upon her death, Donato and Pascual inherited undivided shares. Pascual’s subsequent death transmitted his share to his children, making them co‐owners with Donato.

Extrajudicial Adjudication and Title Transfer

In 1963 Donato executed an Affidavit of Declaration of Heirship, purporting to extrajudicially adjudicate Lot 757 to himself alone. The Register of Deeds canceled OCT RO-8376 and issued TCT No. 35979 in Donato’s name.

Sale and Redemption Transactions

On May 28, 1974, Donato sold Lot 1091 to his daughter Juliana. The lot had been forfeited for non-payment of taxes in 1952 and acquired by the provincial government. On May 29, 1974, Juliana redeemed the entire parcel for ₱2,959.09.

Complaint and Trial Court Proceedings

In January 1975 the respondents filed for partition of both lots and damages. Petitioners pleaded prescription as to Lot 757 and asserted that Juliana acquired full title to Lot 1091 by sale and redemption.

Ruling of the Trial Court and Court of Appeals

The trial court dismissed the respondents’ claim to Lot 757 for prescription. As to Lot 1091 it held that respondents were entitled to one-half undivided share; Juliana’s purchase of Donato’s share made her a co‐owner only, and her redemption entitled her to reimbursement, not exclusive title. The Court of Appeals affirmed.

Succession Rights and Co-ownership Principles

Under Article 777 and 1078 of the Civil Code, heirs acquire rights at death and co-own the estate until partition. Pascual did not predecease Agatona, so representation by his children did not operate at her death. Upon Pascual’s death, his children stepped into his undivided share.

Effects of Co-owner’s Sale and Redemption

Article 493 of the Civil Code allows a co-owner to alienate only his undivided share. A sale of the entire property by one co-owner transfers only that co-owner’s portion, making the purchaser a co-owner (Punsalan v. Boon Liat; Bailon-Casilao v. CA). Redemption by one co-owner likewise preserves co-ownership; it creates a lien for reimbursement (Adille v. CA; Civil Code, arts. 488, 1612–1613).

Petitioners’ Challenge to Accounting

Petitioners contested the trial court’s award of ₱5,000 per annum for ha

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.