Title
Paulmitan vs. Court of Appeals
Case
G.R. No. 61584
Decision Date
Nov 25, 1992
Agatona's heirs disputed ownership of two Negros Occidental lots. SC upheld co-ownership: Juliana and Pascual's heirs each own half of Lot 1091; redemption didn't terminate co-ownership. Petition denied.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 146865)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Succession and Heirs
    • Agatona Sagario Paulmitan died in 1953 owning two parcels in Negros Occidental:
      • Lot No. 757 (1,946 sqm) under OCT No. RO-8376.
      • Lot No. 1091 (69,080 sqm) under OCT No. RO-11653.
    • She left two legitimate sons:
1) Pascual Paulmitan (died later in 1953), father of respondents Alicio, Elena, Abelino, Adelina, Anita, Baking, Anito. 2) Donato Paulmitan (petitioner), father of Juliana P. Fanesa (petitioner) and father-in-law of Rodolfo Fanesa (petitioner).
  • Extrajudicial Transactions
    • August 11, 1963 – Donato executed Affidavit of Declaration of Heirship, adjudicating Lot No. 757 to himself; Register of Deeds issued TCT No. 35979.
    • 1952–1963 – Lot No. 1091 forfeited for non-payment of taxes; Provincial Government bought it; on May 29, 1974 Juliana redeemed it for ₱2,959.09.
    • May 28, 1974 – Donato sold Lot No. 1091 to Juliana by deed of sale.
  • Judicial Proceedings
    • January 18, 1975 – Respondents filed complaint for partition of both lots plus damages.
    • April 22, 1976 – Trial court dismissed action on Lot No. 757 (prescription).
    • May 20, 1977 – Trial court ruled for respondents on Lot No. 1091: each side entitled to ½ undivided share; ordered partition; awarded fruits and redemption reimbursement.
    • July 14, 1982 – Court of Appeals affirmed.
    • November 25, 1992 – Supreme Court denied petition for certiorari.

Issues:

  • Whether Donato’s extrajudicial heirship affidavit and TCT issuance over Lot No. 757 extinguished respondents’ rights.
  • Whether Donato’s sale of Lot No. 1091 to Juliana vested her with ownership of the entire lot.
  • Whether Juliana’s redemption of Lot No. 1091 from the Provincial Government gave her exclusive title to the entire lot.
  • Whether respondents are entitled to fruits of Lot No. 1091 from 1966 until partition.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.