Title
Navarro vs. Ermita
Case
G.R. No. 180050
Decision Date
May 12, 2010
Dinagat Islands' creation via RA 9355 ruled unconstitutional for failing population and land area requirements; IRR exemption invalidated.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 180050)

Procedural Posture and Disposition

Two motions for reconsideration were filed — one by the Office of the Solicitor General on behalf of public respondents and the other by Governor Villaroman. The Court denied both motions for lack of merit and reaffirmed the earlier decision that RA 9355 is unconstitutional, that the proclamation of the Province of Dinagat Islands and the election of its officials are null and void, and that Article 9(2) of the Implementing Rules and Regulations (IRR) of the Local Government Code (providing that the land area requirement shall not apply where the proposed province is composed of one or more islands) is null and void.

Legal Framework — Constitution and Local Government Code

The 1987 Constitution governs because the decision is dated 2010. The controlling constitutional provision is Section 10, Article X (creation, division, merger, abolition or alteration of local government units must conform to criteria in the Local Government Code and be subject to a plebiscite). The primary statutory provisions are Section 461 (requisites for creation of a province) and Section 7 (general powers and attributes of local government units) of R.A. No. 7160 (Local Government Code of 1991). Article 9 of the IRR to the Local Government Code is also central.

Issue Presented

Whether RA 9355 complied with the statutory requisites for creation of a province under Section 461 of the Local Government Code (income plus either a contiguous territory of at least 2,000 square kilometers certified by LMB or a population of at least 250,000 certified by NSO), and whether the IRR provision exempting island provinces from the land area requirement is valid.

Factual Findings Relevant to the Requisites

RA 9355 and supporting documents indicated the proposed province’s land area as approximately 802.12 square kilometers. Official NSO figures: 2000 Census—106,951 population (at time of proclamation December 3, 2006); a special census conducted by the provincial government in 2003 purportedly yielded 371,576 inhabitants but was not certified by NSO; 2007 NSO Census certified Dinagat Islands population as 120,813 (August 1, 2007). The Bureau of Local Government Finance certified the income requirement was met.

Majority Holding — Population Requirement

The Court held that RA 9355 failed the population test under Section 461. The only NSO-certified population figures on record did not meet the 250,000 threshold: the 2000 NSO census and the 2007 NSO census both reflected populations far below 250,000. The special census of 2003 lacked NSO certification and thus could not substitute for the statutorily required NSO certification.

Majority Holding — Land Area and Contiguity Requirement

The Court held the Province failed the territorial/land area requirement because RA 9355 itself reported only approximately 802.12 square kilometers, short of the 2,000 sq. km. mandated by Section 461(a)(i). The Court construed Section 461(b) as dispensing only with the contiguity requirement where the territory comprises two or more islands or is separated by certain chartered cities; paragraph (b) does not exempt such provinces from the minimum land area requirement of 2,000 square kilometers.

IRR Article 9(2) — Validity and Scope

The Court declared Article 9(2) of the IRR (which stated that the land area requirement shall not apply where the proposed province is composed of one or more islands) null and void because it contradicted Section 461 of the Local Government Code. Where an implementing rule conflicts with the statute it implements, the statute controls; the IRR cannot add an exemption to Section 461 that the statute does not contain.

Statutory Interpretation and Separation of Powers

The majority applied a plain-text and functional construction of Section 461 and Section 7, treating contiguity and land area as separate requirements: contiguity may be dispensed with in island cases, but the land area minimum remains unless the legislature itself amends the Local Government Code. The Court emphasized its duty as guardian of the Constitution to ensure that legislative or executive acts comply with statutory and constitutional criteria, notwithstanding any subsequent fait accompli.

Presumption of Validity, Operative Fact Doctrine, and Precedents

The Court rejected movants’ arguments based on presumption of validity and the operative fact doctrine. The presumption of constitutionality does not shield enactments that clearly violate constitutional provisions and statutory criteria. The Court distinguished League of Cities (which applied operative fact and legislative intent considerations because the cityhood laws at issue were understood to implement a legislative intent expressed in R.A. No. 9009) and cited Fariñas and Tan for the principle that courts must not abandon their duty to declare unconstitutional laws that transgress constitutional or statutory limits merely because a new political subdivision has begun operating; acceptance of a fait accompli cannot perpetuate illegality.

Relief and Practical Effect

Because RA 9355 was declared unconstitutional and Article 9(2) of the IRR invalidated, the proclamation of the Province of Dinagat Islands and the election of its officials were declared null and v

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.