Title
Supreme Court
Navarro vs. Ermita
Case
G.R. No. 180050
Decision Date
May 12, 2010
Dinagat Islands' creation via RA 9355 ruled unconstitutional for failing population and land area requirements; IRR exemption invalidated.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 180050)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Parties and Background
    • Petitioners Rodolfo G. Navarro, Victor F. Bernal, and Rene O. Medina challenged Republic Act No. 9355 (RA 9355), creating the Province of Dinagat Islands.
    • Respondents included the Executive Secretary (on behalf of the President), the Senate President, the House Speaker, Governor Robert Ace S. Barbers (Surigao del Norte), and Governor Geraldine Ecleo Villaroman (Dinagat Islands).
  • Statutory Framework
    • Section 461, Local Government Code (LGC): requires average annual income ≥ ₱20 million plus either (i) contiguous territory ≥ 2,000 sq km or (ii) population ≥ 250,000; contiguity may be dispensed if composed of islands.
    • Article 9, IRR of the LGC: reiterates income and either population or land area requirement, adds express exemption that land area need not apply where the proposed province is composed of one or more islands.
  • Creation and Demographics of Dinagat Islands
    • Plebiscite held December 3, 2006 approved creation; officials appointed January 2007; local elections held May 2007.
    • Population per 2000 NSO Census: 106,951; special 2003 provincial census: 371,576 (not NSO-certified); 2007 NSO Census: 120,813.
    • Land area per statute: 802.12 sq km; LMB certificate based on IRR exemption.
  • Procedural History
    • February 10, 2010 En Banc decision declared RA 9355 and IRR Art. 9(2) unconstitutional for failing to meet LGC requirements.
    • Office of the Solicitor General and Governor Villaroman filed Motions for Reconsideration.

Issues:

  • Statutory Compliance
    • Did RA 9355 satisfy Section 461’s population or land area requirement?
    • Is the IRR exemption validly dispensatory of the 2,000 sq km land area criterion?
  • Constitutional and Institutional Questions
    • Should the Legislature’s and Executive’s enactment of RA 9355 be upheld under the presumption of constitutionality?
    • Does the operative-fact doctrine bar judicial relief given Dinagat Islands’ existing governance structures?

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources. AI digests are study aids only—use responsibly.