Case Summary (G.R. No. L-10564)
Factual Background
In 1955, Mandian filed a lawsuit against Dionisio Leong in the Court of First Instance of Davao, claiming he had unlawfully usurped her land and coconut plantation. She sought an accounting of the fruits of the land, damages, and attorney's fees. Dionisio denied the allegations, asserting that he had been administering the property as part of their deceased father's estate, based on an agreement with Mandian. Subsequently, Celestino Leong intervened in the case, asserting his claim to the property and accusing Dionisio of mismanaging the estate.
Legal Proceedings
Celestino's intervention was formally allowed by the court, and he filed an answer that outlined his perspective regarding the title being in Mandian's name due to the husband’s citizenship status. This answer included a cross-claim against Dionisio, who was accused of exclusively possessing the estate and failing to account for its fruits. After the court admitted Celestino's answer, Dionisio's counsel filed a motion declaring him in default for not answering the cross-claim within the specified time frame.
Order of Default and Appeals
The trial court declared Dionisio in default after he failed to respond to the cross-claim on time. Dionisio sought reconsideration, contending that his time to answer should be calculated from the date of the court's admission of Celestino's answer rather than from the date he received it. However, the court denied his motion for reconsideration, leading to Dionisio's appeal to a higher court.
Court’s Rationale
The appellate court dismissed the appeal, highlighting that the order declaring Dionisio in default was interlocutory and could be revised or rescinded by the court prior to a final judgment. The court noted that the cross-claim—filed by Celestino—might still be dismissed, rendering Dionisio’s concerns about the default irrelevant if he were not adversely affected by the cross-claim's outcome. It was reiterated that for a valid appeal, Dionisio needed to file a mo
...continue readingCase Syllabus (G.R. No. L-10564)
Case Overview
- Court: Supreme Court of the Philippines
- Date of Decision: April 25, 1958
- Citation: 103 Phil. 431
- G.R. No.: L-10564
- Parties Involved:
- Plaintiff/Appellee: Mandian (Manoba), widow and second consort of Leon Lung
- Defendant/Appellant: Dionisio Leong, son of the late Leon Lung
- Defendant-Intervenor/Appellee: Celestino Leong, brother of Dionisio Leong
Background of the Case
- The case originated in the Court of First Instance of Davao in 1955, initiated by Mandian (Manoba) against Dionisio Leong.
- Mandian alleged that Dionisio had usurped a parcel of land and coconut plantation in Trinidad, Davao, which was registered in her name under Transfer Certificate of Title No. 561.
- Mandian sought an accounting of the fruits of the land, damages, and attorney's fees.
Defendants' Plea
Dionisio's Defense:
- Denied the allegations of usurpation.
- Claimed possession and administration of the property as part of the estate of his deceased father, Leon Lung, based on an agreement with Mandian.
Celestino Leong's Intervention:
- Filed an answer in intervention stating that the disputed property was acquired during their father’s second marriage to Mandian.
- Asse