Title
Lung Center of the Philippines vs. Quezon City
Case
G.R. No. 144104
Decision Date
Jun 29, 2004
A non-profit hospital sought tax exemption, claiming charitable status. The Supreme Court ruled portions used for hospital operations are exempt, but leased areas for commercial use are taxable.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 144104)

Procedural History and Facts

• June 7, 1993: City Assessor assessed land and building for real property tax at ₱4,554,860; Tax Declarations Nos. C-021-01226 and C-021-01231 issued.
• August 25, 1993: LCP filed a Claim for Exemption based on Section 28(3), Article VI of the 1987 Constitution. Claim denied by the Assessor.
• Appeals to QC Local Board of Assessment Appeals and Central Board of Assessment Appeals – both dismissed LCP’s petition, holding it not “actually, directly and exclusively” devoted to charitable purposes.
• Court of Appeals (CA-G.R. SP No. 57014) affirmed the CBAA decision on July 17, 2000.
• LCP filed a Rule 45 petition for review on certiorari in the Supreme Court.

Issues

  1. Whether LCP qualifies as a “charitable institution” under PD 1823, Article VI, Section 28(3) of the 1987 Constitution (and its predecessor provisions), and Section 234(b) of Republic Act No. 7160 (Local Government Code).
  2. Whether LCP’s real properties are exempt from real property tax as lands, buildings, and improvements “actually, directly and exclusively used for charitable purposes.”

Applicable Law

• Presidential Decree No. 1823 (1981) – creates LCP; grants tax exemption for donations, contributions, equipment imports, income and gift taxes on contributions, and certain government-imposed fees, but does not grant real property tax exemption.
• 1987 Constitution, Article VI, Section 28(3) – exempts from taxation “charitable institutions … and all lands, buildings, and improvements actually, directly and exclusively used for … charitable … purposes.”
• Local Government Code (R.A. 7160), Section 234(b) – implements the constitutional exemption for real property tax, requiring actual, direct, and exclusive use for charitable purposes.
• Doctrine of strictissimi juris – tax exemptions are exceptions to the rule and must be clearly and unmistakably provided.

Court’s Analysis

Charitable Institution Status
• Charity defined as a gift or an entity benefiting an indefinite class of beneficiaries through relief, education, health, or other public-minded purposes.
• Factors: statutory creation, corporate purposes, bylaws, administration, nature of work, beneficiaries, and use of properties.
• LCP’s charter and Articles of Incorporation mandate non-discriminatory medical service for lung diseases, research, training, public education, and reliance on donations and subsidies.
• Accepting fees from paying patients and leasing premises does not defeat charitable character so long as proceeds are devoted solely to charitable objectives and no private benefit inures to organizers. Subsidies are akin to donations.

Tax Exemption of Real Property
• Under PD 1823, LCP enjoys specified tax privileges but none for real property; expressio unius est exclusio alterius excludes other exemptions.
• Constitutional and statutory exemptions apply only to property “actually, directly and exclusively” used for charitable purposes.
• Por





...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.