Title
Lung Center of the Philippines vs. Quezon City
Case
G.R. No. 144104
Decision Date
Jun 29, 2004
A non-profit hospital sought tax exemption, claiming charitable status. The Supreme Court ruled portions used for hospital operations are exempt, but leased areas for commercial use are taxable.
A

Case Digest (G.R. No. 144104)

Facts:

  • Parties and Corporate Background
    • Petitioner Lung Center of the Philippines (LCP) is a non-stock, non-profit corporation created by Presidential Decree No. 1823 on January 16, 1981.
    • It is administered under the Office of the President in coordination with the Ministry of Health and the Ministry of Human Settlements.
  • Property Description and Use
    • LCP owns Lot No. RP-3-B-3A-1-B-1, SWO-04-000495 (121,463 sqm), TCT No. 261320, at Quezon Avenue corner Elliptical Road, Quezon City. A hospital building stands on the lot.
    • Uses of the land/building:
      • Ground floor leased to canteen operators, small stores, and private medical practitioners.
      • Left side of building: vacant; right corner leased to “Elliptical Orchids and Garden Center.”
      • Hospital admits paying and non-paying (charity) patients; renders in-patient/out-patient services; receives annual government subsidies.
  • Assessment and Administrative Proceedings
    • On June 7, 1993, the City Assessor assessed land and building for real property tax amounting to ₱4,554,860, issuing Tax Declarations Nos. C-021-01226 and C-021-01231.
    • On August 25, 1993, LCP filed a Claim for Exemption under its charitable status; the City Assessor denied the claim.
    • Appeals:
      • QC Local Board of Assessment Appeals (QC-LBAA) dismissed LCP’s petition.
      • Central Board of Assessment Appeals (CBAA) affirmed QC-LBAA.
      • Court of Appeals in CA-G.R. SP No. 57014 affirmed CBAA on July 17, 2000.
      • LCP filed a petition for review on certiorari with the Supreme Court.

Issues:

  • Whether the petitioner is a charitable institution under Presidential Decree No. 1823, the 1973 and 1987 Constitutions, and Section 234(b) of Republic Act No. 7160.
  • Whether the petitioner’s real properties are exempt from real property taxation under the foregoing laws.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.