Title
IN RE: Buscayno vs. Military Commissions
Case
G.R. No. L-58284
Decision Date
Nov 19, 1981
Civilians Buscayno and Sison, charged with subversion and rebellion, challenged military tribunal jurisdiction and habeas corpus suspension; Supreme Court upheld convictions, citing waived rights and ongoing offenses.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 169190)

Military Commission Proceedings

Buscayno waived counsel and presence at initial arraignments, pleaded not guilty, and declined to present evidence. The commission found him guilty of subversion and murder in 1977 and imposed death by firing squad. Upon presidential directive, the trial was reopened in late 1977 and resumed in 1981; Buscayno again did not testify, and the commission reaffirmed its death penalty. The Sison spouses’ rebellion and subversion trials proceeded likewise.

Habeas Corpus Petitions

Buscayno filed two prior petitions (L-47185 in 1977; dismissed January 15, 1981) and the Sison spouses filed one (L-49579; also dismissed January 15, 1981). The instant omnibus petition (October 2, 1981) sought release, dismissal of charges for double jeopardy, prohibition of further commission proceedings, and bail.

Suspension of the Writ of Habeas Corpus and Bail

Proclamation No. 2045 (January 17, 1981) terminated martial law but expressly continued suspension of the writ for persons detained for insurrection, rebellion, or subversion. Under this suspension, petitioners cannot invoke the privilege of the writ and are not entitled to bail (Lansang v. Garcia, 42 SCRA 448).

Scope of Judicial Review

The Court held that errors or due-process complaints regarding military commission proceedings must be addressed first by the reviewing military authority (Court of Military Appeals) under P.D. 1498, secs. 86(f) and 87(e). Generally, this Court does not supervise interlocutory acts of military tribunals, limiting its review to final decisions appealed through the military appellate system.

Revised Anti-Subversion Law and Repealing Clause

Juliet de Lima-Sison’s contention that P.D. 885 repealed RA 1700 retroactively was rejected: P.D. 885, sec. 7, contains a saving clause preserving prosecution and punishment for acts committed under the former law before its effectivity and for pending cases. Section 14(i) of the National Security Code reenacts this transitional provision.

Double Jeopardy Issue

Petitioners argued that subversion and rebellion charges involved the same acts, invoking the constitutional prohibition ag

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.