Title
IN RE: Buscayno vs. Military Commissions
Case
G.R. No. L-58284
Decision Date
Nov 19, 1981
Civilians Buscayno and Sison, charged with subversion and rebellion, challenged military tribunal jurisdiction and habeas corpus suspension; Supreme Court upheld convictions, citing waived rights and ongoing offenses.

Case Digest (G.R. No. L-58284)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Background
    • Bernabe Buscayno (alias Commander Dante) and Jose Ma. Sison (alias Amado Guerrero) were classified as high-value subversives since 1971; bounties of ₱150,000 and ₱50,000 respectively were set under Department Order No. 610.
    • Both were placed on the “National Target List” under General Order No. 2 (Sept. 22, 1972) ordering their arrest as active participants in a conspiracy to overthrow the government.
  • Charges and Proceedings
    • Buscayno
      • Charged with subversion (RA 1700) and murder before Military Commission No. 2 (Criminal Cases MC-2-23, MC-2-22) based on alleged overt acts from 1965 to 1971.
      • Charged with rebellion before Military Commission No. 1 (MC-1-92) and its successor Special Military Commission No. 1 (SMC-1-1) for uprisings in 1972 and activities through February 1974.
      • Arrested Aug. 26, 1976; waived counsel and presentation of evidence; found guilty and sentenced to death by firing squad in Nov. 1977; earlier habeas corpus petition (L-47185) dismissed Jan. 15, 1981.
    • Jose Ma. Sison and Juliet Sison
      • Juliet: charged with subversion before Military Commission No. 6 (Case No. 55) in Nov. 1972 for leadership in Kabataang Makabayan and related activities.
      • Jose: charged under PD 885 before Military Commission No. 25 (Case No. 113) in Oct. 1978 for organizing and leading the CPP/NPA.
      • Both charged with rebellion in SMC-1-1 (amended Nov. 8, 1977) alongside 91 co-accused; prior habeas corpus petition (L-49579) dismissed Jan. 15, 1981.
  • Instant Petition
    • On Oct. 2, 1981 petitioners filed an omnibus petition for habeas corpus, prohibition, and mandamus seeking:
      • Declaration that Buscayno’s subversion/murder conviction is void for denial of right to present evidence and his release.
      • Dismissal of rebellion and subversion charges on double jeopardy grounds.
      • Injunction against Military Commissions Nos. 1, 6, 25 from further proceedings and entitlement to bail.

Issues:

  • Are petitioners illegally detained and entitled to release or bail?
  • Do military commissions have jurisdiction to try civilians for subversion, rebellion, and related offenses?
  • Does prosecution of both subversion and rebellion constitute double jeopardy?
  • Did PD 885’s repeal of RA 1700 extinguish liability for subversive acts under the former law?
  • Under Proclamation No. 2045, can petitioners detained for subversion or rebellion obtain bail?

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.