Title
Heirs of Narvasa, Sr. vs. Imbornal
Case
G.R. No. 182908
Decision Date
Aug 6, 2014
Heirs of Basilia Imbornal dispute ownership of land and accretions, alleging implied trust and fraud. SC denies reconveyance, citing prescription, valid homestead patent, and respondents' acquisition of accretions by prescription.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 182908)

Petitioners

Heirs of Francisco I. Narvasa Sr., heirs of Petra Imbornal and Pedro Ferrer, represented by attorney-in-fact Remedios B. Narvasa-Regacho, asserting co-ownership and seeking reconveyance, partition, or damages for the Motherland and both accretions.

Respondents

Descendants of Pablo Imbornal—Emiliana, Victoriano, Felipe, Mateo, Raymundo, Maria, and Eduardo—holding Torrens titles to the First and Second Accretions and in possession of the southern portion of the Motherland.

Key Dates

• 1920: Basilia conveys Sabangan property to her daughters.
• December 5, 1933: OCT No. 1462 issued to Ciriaco under Homestead Patent No. 24991.
• May 10, 1973: OCT No. 1462 reissued as TCT No. 101495 to Ciriaco’s heirs.
• 1949: First Accretion (59,772 sqm) forms; August 15, 1952: OCT P-318 issued to Victoriano.
• 1971: Second Accretion (32,307 sqm) forms; November 10, 1978: OCT 21481 issued to respondents.
• February 27, 1984: Amended Complaint filed.
• August 20, 1996: RTC Decision in favor of petitioners.
• November 28, 2006: CA Decision reversing RTC.
• May 7, 2008: CA denies reconsideration.
• August 6, 2014: Supreme Court Decision.

Applicable Law

• 1987 Philippine Constitution
• Civil Code (Art. 1456 on implied trusts; Art. 457 on accretion)
• Commonwealth Act No. 141, Public Land Act (homestead requirements)
• Lands Administrative Order No. 7-1 (riparian preference)
• Torrens system principles and prescription rules

Factual Background

Basilia’s daughters funded Ciriaco’s homestead patent application by selling the Sabangan property. Upon approval, OCT No. 1462 was issued in Ciriaco’s name. He and his heirs occupied the northern portion of the Motherland; respondents occupied the southern portion. When the Cayanga River deposited adjoining land, two accretions formed. Respondents registered the First Accretion under OCT P-318 and the Second Accretion under OCT 21481. Petitioners alleged that Ciriaco held the Motherland and the accretions in trust for the Imbornal sisters, having funded his patent with the Sabangan proceeds, and that respondents obtained the accretions through deceit.

Regional Trial Court Decision

The RTC (Branch 44, Dagupan City) on August 20, 1996 recognized an implied trust arising from the sale proceeds of the Sabangan property. It held that petitioners, as successors of Balbina and Alejandra, were co-owners of the Motherland and its accretions. The court ordered reconveyance or payment of pecuniary equivalents and awarded actual (₱100,000), moral (₱100,000) damages, attorney’s fees (₱10,000), and costs.

Court of Appeals Decision

On November 28, 2006, the CA reversed the RTC. It ruled that Ciriaco alone validly acquired the Motherland under an indefeasible homestead patent and Torrens title and that petitioners could not attack it collaterally. Regarding the accretions, the CA held that respondents, though not riparian owners of the original parcel, acquired the First and Second Accretions by acquisitive prescription and Torrens registration, rendering their titles indefeasible. The CA dismissed petitioners’ claims and denied their motion for reconsideration on May 7, 2008.

Issue

Whether the CA erred in (a) declaring Ciriaco’s descendants exclusive owners of the Motherland and (b) declaring respondents exclusive owners of the First and Second Accretions, based on prescription and an alleged implied trust.

Supreme Court Decision

  1. Prescription: Actions for reconveyance based on implied trust prescribe in ten years from issuance of title if the true owner is not in possession. Petitioners filed suit in 1984, well beyond ten years for the Motherland (1933 → 1943) and the First Accretion (1952 → 1962

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.