Title
Supreme Court
Heirs of Narvasa, Sr. vs. Imbornal
Case
G.R. No. 182908
Decision Date
Aug 6, 2014
Heirs of Basilia Imbornal dispute ownership of land and accretions, alleging implied trust and fraud. SC denies reconveyance, citing prescription, valid homestead patent, and respondents' acquisition of accretions by prescription.

Case Digest (G.R. No. L-12196)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Parties and Lineage
    • Basilia Imbornal had four children: Alejandra, Balbina, Catalina, and Pablo.
    • Francisco I. Narvasa, Sr. and Pedro Ferrer were children of Alejandra; Petra Imbornal was daughter of Balbina. Petitioners are heirs of Francisco, Pedro, and Petra. Respondents Emiliana, Victoriano, Felipe, Mateo, Raymundo, Maria, and Eduardo are descendants of Pablo.
  • Properties and Titles
    • “Sabangan property” (4,144 sq. m.) conveyed by Basilia (c. 1920) to Balbina, Alejandra, and Catalina; sale proceeds allegedly funded homestead application.
    • “Motherland” (31,367 sq. m.) adjacent to Cayanga River: Homestead Patent No. 24991 issued to Ciriaco Abrio; OCT No. 1462 in his name (1933); later TCT No. 101495 in heirs’ names. Northern portion occupied by Abrio heirs, southern by respondents.
    • First Accretion (59,772 sq. m.) formed c. 1949; OCT No. P-318 issued to respondent Victoriano (1952), later reissued in respondents’ names.
    • Second Accretion (32,307 sq. m.) formed 1971; OCT No. 21481 issued to all respondents (1978).
  • Procedural History
    • February 27, 1984: Petitioners filed Amended Complaint for reconveyance, partition, and damages, alleging an implied trust and fraud in registrations.
    • August 20, 1996: RTC, Branch 44, Dagupan City, ruled for petitioners, finding an implied trust and ordering reconveyance and damages.
    • November 28, 2006: CA in CA-G.R. CV No. 57618 reversed RTC, declaring Abrio heirs exclusive owners of the Motherland; Victoriano’s descendants owners of First Accretion; all respondents owners of Second Accretion.
    • May 7, 2008: CA denied petitioners’ motion for reconsideration.
    • August 6, 2014: Supreme Court received petition for review on certiorari; decision promulgated March 16, 2015 (740 Phil. 541).

Issues:

  • Whether the CA erred in declaring that:
    • Descendants of Ciriaco are exclusive owners of the Motherland.
    • Descendants of respondent Victoriano are exclusive owners of the First Accretion.
    • Descendants of Pablo (respondents) are exclusive owners of the Second Accretion.
  • Whether petitioners’ claims fail on the grounds of:
    • Prescription of the action for reconveyance.
    • Nonexistence of an implied trust between Catalina (through Ciriaco) and the Imbornal sisters.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources. AI digests are study aids only—use responsibly.