Case Summary (G.R. No. 183572)
Facts of the Case
On April 22, 1971, a joint team from the Central Intelligence Service (CIS), the Central Bank, and the Manila Police conducted a raid on the petitioner’s office located at Room 305, ABC Building, Escolta, Manila, based on a search warrant that alleged violations of Central Bank regulations. The authorities confiscated a variety of items including checks, notebooks, receipts, and statements of account linked to the petitioner’s Bank of America account, which were purportedly involved in unauthorized foreign currency transactions. Following the raid, the petitioner was advised to report for investigation, but only her legal representative appeared.
Grounds for Appeal
In her appeal, the petitioner raised several arguments challenging the Court of Appeals' conclusions. First, she contended that the evidence was improperly interpreted, leading to the conclusion that the checks were drawn in the Philippines solely based on the printed address. The petitioner argued that the checks, being payable to foreign entities and negotiated abroad, indicated that they were issued outside the Philippines. Second, she took issue with the Court of Appeals' interpretation that maintaining dollar accounts abroad was prohibited under the relevant Central Bank circulars, arguing that such a conclusion required judicial legislating beyond the text of the law. Lastly, the petitioner asserted that the appellate court improperly placed the burden of proof on her to establish innocence, contrary to the presumption of innocence that should exist until guilt is proven beyond a reasonable doubt.
Legal Framework
The applicable law in this case includes Section 3 of Central Bank Circular No. 265, as amended by Circular No. 289, which outlines regulations on the exportation of foreign currency. The circular specifically prohibits the unauthorized exportation of foreign currency while allowing for the receipt of foreign exchange through lawful means. Furthermore, the penal provisions of Republic Act No. 265, particularly Section 34, set forth the conditions under which a person may be prosecuted for violations of Central Bank regulations.
Analysis of the Court's Decision
The Supreme Court found merit in the petitioner’s arguments, particularly emphasizing that the legal framework did not contain a prohibition against citizens or residents maintaining foreign currency accounts abroad. The Court noted that the regulatory provisions allowed individuals to carry and manage foreign currency as authorized by the Central Bank. Thus, contradicting the lower courts' conclusions, the Supreme Court clarified that the confiscated checks could not logically be deemed as drawn in the Philippines since the foreign payees were located ab
...continue readingCase Syllabus (G.R. No. 183572)
Case Overview
- This case involves a petition for review on certiorari by Francisca Puzon y Gaerlan against the Court of Appeals and the People of the Philippines.
- The petition stems from a decision dated June 10, 1981, which affirmed the conviction of the petitioner for violating Section 34 of Republic Act No. 265, in relation to Central Bank (CB) Circular No. 265, as amended by Circular No. 289.
- The petitioner was sentenced to one year and one day of imprisonment, a fine of ₱2,000.00, with subsidiary imprisonment in case of insolvency, and to pay costs.
Factual Background
- On April 22, 1971, a joint team from the Central Bank and Manila Police conducted a raid on the petitioner's office, armed with a search warrant for a violation of CB Circular No. 265.
- Items confiscated during the raid included checks, notebooks, receipts, and bank statements from the Bank of America.
- The petitioner was later advised to report for investigation, but only her lawyer appeared on the appointed date.
- A letter-complaint was drafted by Sgt. Mangente on April 26, 1971, leading to the filing of the case in court.