Title
De Lima vs. Laguna Tayabas Co.
Case
G.R. No. L-35697-99
Decision Date
Apr 15, 1988
A 1958 bus-truck collision led to death and injuries; prolonged litigation ended with SC ruling legal interest from trial court’s decision and increasing death indemnity to P30,000.

Case Summary (G.R. No. L-66136)

Background of the Case

This action arose from a vehicular collision between a passenger bus operated by Laguna Tayabas Bus Co. and a delivery truck from the Seven-Up Bottling Company. This collision resulted in the death of a passenger, Petra de la Cruz, and serious injuries to Eladia de Lima and Nemesio Flores. The victims subsequently filed three civil suits against the respondents, which were consolidated for trial in the Court of First Instance of Laguna. The trial court ruled in favor of the plaintiffs, awarding damages for loss of money, medical expenses, and loss of earnings among other compensatory claims.

Trial Court Decision

In its decision dated December 27, 1963, the lower court ordered the defendants to pay joint and several compensatory damages to the petitioners, detailing the specific amounts awarded for various types of losses. However, the plaintiffs' motion for reconsideration seeking legal interest on these awarded amounts was not acted upon, leading to a series of subsequent motions and appeals mainly initiated by the defendants, who appealed the decision to the Court of Appeals, while the plaintiffs chose not to appeal due to financial constraints.

Court of Appeals Ruling

On January 31, 1972, the Court of Appeals modified the lower court's ruling slightly by awarding legal interest on the damages but only from the date of its decision, rather than the trial court's judgment date. The petitioners later filed a motion for reconsideration, seeking to have the interest retroactively start from the date of the lower court's decision and to increase the civil indemnity for the death of Petra de la Cruz.

Issues Presented

The key legal issues presented were:

  1. Whether the Court of Appeals erred by setting the commencement of legal interest from its decision rather than from the trial court's decision.
  2. Whether the Court of Appeals erred by not increasing the indemnity for the death of Petra de la Cruz from P3,000.00 to P12,000.00 as sought by the petitioners.

Resolution of the First Issue

The Supreme Court found merit in the petition regarding the first issue, stating that the jurisprudence holds that legal interest should normally be computed from the rendition of the trial court's decision. Respondents argued that petitioners could not question the ruling since they did not appeal from the trial court's decision; however, the Court emphasized exceptions based on equitable grounds as provided in Article 2210 of the Civil Code, allowing for such discretion by the courts in awarding interest.

Rationale for Legal Interest

The Court noted that the plaintiffs had attempted to include a request for legal interest, although the trial court had not acted on it. It determined that denying legal interest to the petitioners while awarding it to others from the same incident would be inequitable. The Court thus concluded that legal interest on damages should be awarded from the trial court's decision date of December 27, 1963.

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.