Title
De Lima vs. Laguna Tayabas Co.
Case
G.R. No. L-35697-99
Decision Date
Apr 15, 1988
A 1958 bus-truck collision led to death and injuries; prolonged litigation ended with SC ruling legal interest from trial court’s decision and increasing death indemnity to P30,000.

Case Digest (G.R. No. L-35697-99)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • The Incident and Consolidation of Cases
    • A collision occurred on June 3, 1958, involving a passenger bus operated by Laguna Tayabas Bus Co. (LTB) and a delivery truck of Seven-Up Bottling Co. of the Philippines.
    • As a result of the collision, Petra de la Cruz was killed, while Eladia de Lima and Nemesio Flores suffered serious physical injuries.
    • Three separate civil actions were filed against the respondents, which were subsequently consolidated for trial before the Court of First Instance of Laguna in San Pablo City.
  • The Decision of the Trial Court (Court a quo)
    • On December 27, 1963, the trial court rendered judgment awarding damages against the defendants.
    • In Civil Case No. SP-239 (plaintiff Eladia de Lima), the award included:
      • Loss of money and medical expenses amounting to P960.00.
      • Loss of earnings from June 3, 1958, to November 3, 1958 amounting to P924.00.
      • Expenses of litigation and attorney’s fees totaling P1,000.00.
      • A total award of P2,884.00.
    • In Civil Case No. SP-240 (plaintiffs Requijos), the award included:
      • Compensation for the death of Petra de la Cruz including funeral expenses amounting to P3,883.82.
      • Money lost during the trip amounting to P800.00.
      • Moral damages for mental anguish of P3,000.00.
      • Loss of earning capacity for 5 years valued at P8,000.00.
      • Expenses of litigation and attorney’s fees amounting to P2,500.00.
      • A total award of P18,183.82.
    • In Civil Case No. SP-268 (plaintiff Nemesio Flores), the award included:
      • Loss of earning capacity for 5 years from June 3, 1958 at a rate of P228.00 per month, totaling P13,680.00.
      • Expenses of litigation and attorney’s fees amounting to P1,000.00.
      • A total award of P14,680.00.
  • Subsequent Motions and the Court of Appeals
    • Plaintiffs in Cases Nos. SP-239 and SP-240 filed a motion for reconsideration seeking an award of legal interest from the date of the trial court’s decision; however, the court a quo did not act on this motion.
    • The plaintiffs voluntarily desisted from appealing the trial court’s decision due to financial necessity and in the hope that the transportation company (LTB Co.) would promptly pay the awarded amounts.
    • The defendants, dissatisfied with the trial court’s decision, opted to appeal to the Court of Appeals.
    • On December 29, 1971, petitioners submitted a motion to the Court of Appeals requesting:
      • Immediate adjudication of the case.
      • An order for legal interest on the awarded amounts to run from the trial court’s decision date (December 27, 1963) instead of the appellate decision date (January 31, 1972).
      • An increase in the civil indemnity for the death of Petra de la Cruz from P3,000.00 to P12,000.00.
    • The Court of Appeals promulgated its decision on January 31, 1972.
    • Petitioners then moved for a reconsideration of the appellate decision, seeking a modification regarding the start date of legal interest and an increased indemnity for the death of Petra de la Cruz.
  • The Basis for the Dispute
    • The assignment of errors raised two key issues:
      • Whether legal interest should run from the date of the trial court’s decision or from the date of the Court of Appeals’ decision.
      • Whether the civil indemnity for the death of Petra de la Cruz should be increased beyond the P3,000.00 awarded by the trial court.
    • The petitioners argued for the application of a liberal and equitable approach, noting that:
      • Plaintiffs had sought interest in their earlier motions, and only one plaintiff (Nemesio Flores) had expressly reiterated the claim in his brief.
      • The delay in final adjudication and the appellants’ indigence warranted a reconsideration on substantive grounds rather than purely technical ones.
    • The respondents contended that:
      • The plaintiffs’ failure to timely appeal certain aspects of the trial court’s decision should preclude any modification or additional relief on technical grounds.
      • The awarding of legal interest from the Court of Appeals’ decision was within the discretion of that court.

Issues:

  • Timing of the Legal Interest Award
    • Should the legal interest on the damages awarded commence from the date of the trial court’s decision (December 27, 1963) or from the date of the Court of Appeals’ decision (January 31, 1972)?
  • Increase in the Civil Indemnity for Death
    • Should the civil indemnity for the death of Petra de la Cruz be increased from the trial court’s awarded amount of P3,000.00 to a higher sum, as prayed for by the petitioners?

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.