Title
Casar vs. Soluren
Case
A.M. No. RTJ-12-2333
Decision Date
Oct 22, 2012
Judge Soluren violated OCA Circular No. 03-2010 by conducting unauthorized jail visits, soliciting inmate signatures to influence a case, undermining judicial integrity; fined P10,000.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 121468)

Complaint Overview

On August 12, 2011, the complainants lodged an administrative complaint against Judge Soluren, alleging Gross Misconduct. They claimed that she unlawfully visited the Aurora Provincial Jail on multiple occasions—specifically June 20, June 22, and July 19 of 2011—contrary to the Office of the Court Administrator (OCA) Circular No. 03-2010, which prohibited Executive Judges and Presiding Judges from conducting jail visits pending a review of certain judicial procedures.

Allegations and Evidence

The complainants asserted that the Judge's visits aimed to pressure inmates into signing a letter directed to then Chief Justice Renato C. Corona, which sought to dismiss an administrative complaint against her and sought the removal of another judge. Supporting evidence was presented, including a certification from the Prison Guard Administrator evidencing the Judge's unauthorized visits, an affidavit provided by Dolores P. Sollano, who accompanied Judge Soluren on these visits, and a letter from the inmates indicating that they were unaware of the letter's significance and wished to withdraw their support.

Judge's Response

In her Comment dated November 5, 2011, Judge Soluren acknowledged her attendance at the jail but contended that these visits were not official and that she lacked staff assistance, implying that they did not breach any formal judicial procedures. This defense, however, did not mitigate the underlying concerns of impropriety raised by the complainants.

Findings of the Office of the Court Administrator

Following further submissions from both parties, the OCA issued a report on August 17, 2012, characterizing Judge Soluren's actions as Simple Misconduct. A penalty of P10,000 was recommended, to be deducted from her retirement benefits, given her impending retirement on January 29, 2012.

Ruling and Judicial Analysis

The Court resolved to adopt the OCA's findings and recommendation. The Court expressed its determination that Judge Soluren's attempts to solicit signatures from inmates—especially those whose cases were under her jurisdiction—constituted a severe impropriety that undermined public confidence in the impartiality of the

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.