Case Digest (A.M. No. RTJ-12-2333)
Facts:
- Judge Corazon D. Soluren of the Regional Trial Court (RTC), Branch 96, Baler, Aurora, was found guilty of simple misconduct.
- The case was filed by Assistant Provincial Prosecutors Hydierabad A. Casar, Jonald E. Hernandez, Dante P. Sindac, and Atty. Jobert D. Reyes of the Public Attorney's Office, Baler, Aurora.
- Judge Soluren visited the Aurora Provincial Jail on June 20 and 22, 2011, and July 19, 2011.
- During her visits, she met with inmates, including those who had pending cases before her court.
- The purpose of her visit was to persuade the prisoners to sign a letter addressed to then Chief Justice Renato C. Corona.
- The letter called for the dismissal of an administrative complaint filed against her and the removal of Judge Evelyn Atienza-Turla as Presiding Judge of RTC, Branch 6, Baler, Aurora.
- The complainants presented evidence, including a certification from the Prison Guard Administrator confirming Judge Soluren's unauthorized visits to the provincial jail.
- They also presented an affidavit from Dolores P. Sollano, who accompanied Judge Soluren during the visits.
- A handwritten letter from the detention prisoners admitting that they were not aware of the letter's import and wishing to withdraw their signatures was also presented.
Issue:
- (Unlock)
Ruling:
- Judge Soluren was found guilty of simple misconduct.
- The Supreme Court adopted the recommendation of the Office of the Court Administrato...(Unlock)
Ratio:
- The Court emphasized the importance of avoiding impropriety and maintaining pu...continue reading
Case Digest (A.M. No. RTJ-12-2333)
Facts:
The case of Casar v. Soluren involves an administrative complaint against Judge Corazon D. Soluren of the Regional Trial Court (RTC), Branch 96, Baler, Aurora. The complaint was filed by Assistant Provincial Prosecutors Hydierabad A. Casar, Jonald E. Hernandez, Dante P. Sindac, and Atty. Jobert D. Reyes, who accused Judge Soluren of gross misconduct. The complainants alleged that Judge Soluren visited the Aurora Provincial Jail on multiple occasions and met with inmates, including those who had pending cases before her court. This was in violation of Office of the Court Administrator (OCA) Circular No. 03-2010, which suspended jail visitation and inspection by judges. The purpose of Judge Soluren's visits was to persuade the prisoners to sign a letter addressed to then Chief Justice Renato C. Corona, calling for the dismissal of an administrative complaint filed against her and the removal of another judge. The complainants provided evidence of Judge Soluren's unauthorized visits, including a certification from the Prison Guard Administrator and an affidavit from her companion during the visits. The detainees later expressed their lack of understanding of the letter's content and wished to withdraw their signatures. In her defense, Judge Soluren admitted to visiting the jail but claimed that they were not official visitat...