Title
Cang vs. Court of Appeals
Case
G.R. No. 105308
Decision Date
Sep 25, 1998
Herbert Cang contested his children’s adoption, claiming no abandonment. The Supreme Court ruled in his favor, finding he maintained financial support and emotional ties, making his consent necessary under Philippine law.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 105308)

Factual Background

• Marriage of Herbert and Anna Marie in 1973; three children born.
• Legal separation in Cebu via compromise, with agreed monthly support and grant to Anna Marie of separate legal capacity.
• Herbert moved to the U.S., obtained a Nevada divorce and naturalized as an American, while remitting some support funds.
• Anna Marie and her relatives filed for adoption, alleging Herbert’s abandonment.

Lower Courts’ Findings

RTC of Cebu City (Branch 14) granted adoption, finding:

  1. Strong emotional ties between children and Clavanos.
  2. Clavanos’ superior financial capacity.
  3. Mother’s consent based on father’s forfeiture of rights.
  4. Children’s desire for adoption.
  5. Father morally unfit and effectively abandoned family.

Court of Appeals affirmed, holding that written consent of an abandoning parent is not required and concluding Herbert had abandoned his parental duties.

Supreme Court’s Analysis on Consent and Abandonment

• Written consent of both natural parents is an indispensable requirement under Articles 31 (P.D. 603) and 188 (Family Code).
• Consent may be dispensed with only if parent is insane, hopelessly intemperate, or has abandoned the child—issues that must be proven.
• Abandonment means a settled purpose to renounce all parental duties and claims, not merely physical absence.
• Philippi e courts misappreciated evidence: Herbert maintained emotional ties through correspondence, remittances, and affirmative steps to oppose adoption.
• Financial shortcomings alone do not constitute abandonment or unfitness.

Balancing Best Interests and Parental Rights

• Paramount consideration is the welfare of the child, which includes emotional, psychological, social, and spiritual needs.
• Parental authority is a constitutionally protected right and duty that may not be lightly extinguished.
• Domestic and international policies (Family Code, RA 8552, UN Convention) emphasize preserving family

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.