Title
Cang vs. Court of Appeals
Case
G.R. No. 105308
Decision Date
Sep 25, 1998
Herbert Cang contested his children’s adoption, claiming no abandonment. The Supreme Court ruled in his favor, finding he maintained financial support and emotional ties, making his consent necessary under Philippine law.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 105308)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Parties and Marriage
    • Herbert Cang (petitioner) and Anna Marie Clavano married on January 27, 1973; they had three children: Keith (b. July 3, 1973), Charmaine (b. January 23, 1977) and Joseph Anthony (b. January 3, 1981).
    • Anna Marie is sister of Ronald V. Clavano (private respondent) and sister-in-law of Maria Clara Diago Clavano (private respondent).
  • Legal Separation, Divorce and Custody
    • Anna Marie discovered Herbert’s alleged affair, filed for legal separation with alimony pendente lite in Cebu JDR Court (Civil Case No. JD-707), where spouses agreed to live separately and Anna Marie gained authority to contract without Herbert’s consent; support of ₱1,000 monthly was ordered.
    • Herbert left for the United States, obtained a Nevada divorce (custody to Anna Marie, visitation rights reserved), worked and sent support and bank deposits for the children.
  • Adoption Proceedings and Lower-Court Decisions
    • On September 25, 1987, Ronald and Maria Clara Clavano filed for adoption of the three Cang minors in RTC Cebu City (Special Proceedings No. 1744-CEB), attaching Anna Marie’s affidavit of consent (citing Herbert’s abandonment) and Keith’s written consent (age 14).
    • Herbert returned, opposed the adoption for want of his written consent and moved to reacquire custody; Branch 19 awarded custody to Herbert, but Branch 14 later granted the Clavanos’ petition, concluding Herbert was morally unfit, in arrears on support, divorced, naturalized U.S. citizen and had abandoned his children.
  • Court of Appeals Affirmation
    • The CA held that under P.D. 603 (as amended) and the Family Code, a parent who abandons a child need not consent to adoption.
    • It found Herbert in default of support obligations, his accounts operable only by him, and therefore abandoned the children, dispensing with his consent and affirming the RTC’s adoption decree.

Issues:

  • Whether the adoption decree is valid despite the absence of the natural father’s written consent under P.D. 603, E.O. 91 and the Family Code.
  • Whether Herbert Cang abandoned his children so as to dispense with his consent to their adoption.
  • Whether the lower courts’ factual finding of abandonment is supported by evidence.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.