Title
Ausejo vs. Pajunar
Case
A.M. No. 253-MJ
Decision Date
May 29, 1975
Mayor Ausejo accused Judge Pajunar of absenteeism, ignorance, and partiality. Charges dismissed as unsubstantiated; Supreme Court upheld dismissal due to lack of evidence.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 206484)

Allegations Against the Respondent

Judge Pajunar faced a series of allegations in the administrative complaint filed by Mayor Ausejo. The charges included unauthorized absences from his judicial duties, ignorance of the law, and exhibiting partiality and unfairness in his role as a municipal judge. These serious allegations prompted an investigation into the conduct of the respondent, necessitating a fair hearing to assess the validity of the claims.

Jurisdiction and Initial Proceedings

The administrative complaint was initially referred to the Executive Judge of Dumaguete City, Macario P. Santos, as the jurisdiction over such matters rested with the Department of Justice at that time. The respondent offered an answer contesting the allegations against him, asserting their lack of truthfulness. Following this, a hearing was scheduled, during which the complainant's witness provided testimony.

Manifestation to Dismiss the Case

During the course of the hearings, the complainant's counsel expressed concerns regarding the reliability of the testimonies from the witnesses. Notably, he identified inconsistencies in their statements and concluded that continuing the investigation would likely fail to sustain the charges against Judge Pajunar. Therefore, he respectfully requested that the administrative case be dismissed and the investigation concluded, indicating a significant shift in the complainant's position.

Hearing Outcomes and Recommendations

Following the complainant’s counsel’s manifestation, Judge Macario P. Santos recommended the dismissal of the case. The recommendation arose from the acknowledgment that the evidence presented was insufficient to substantiate the allegations against Judge Pajunar. The recommendation emphasized that the legal standards for such complaints had not been met, paving the way for resolution.

Final Resolution

Ultimately, the matter was refer

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.