Title
Salvador vs. Court of Appeals
Case
G.R. No. 124899
Decision Date
Mar 30, 2004
Romayne appointed Gilbert as attorney-in-fact to manage her property. Gilbert contracted Salvador for development, but disputes arose over additional costs and work stoppage due to lack of permits. Court dismissed Salvador’s claims, citing lack of written authorization for extra works and invalid escalation demands. Respondents’ counterclaims also denied due to mutual fault.
A
Very Long 31 min
1.8x of typical case length

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.