A.M. No. 00-6-09-SC - Re: Imposition of Corresponding Penalties for Habitual Tardiness

Re: Imposition of Corresponding Penalties for Habitual Tardiness

Getting related questions...
Conversations stay on your device. We do not store or track your activity on our servers. Know more about your privacy jur.ph/privacy Ask AI provides quick answers grounded in full case texts to avoid mistakes. Always verify with the original text.

Ask AI

Title Supreme Court: Re: Imposition of Corresponding Penalties for Habitual Tardiness

Case: A.M. No. 00-6-09-SC

Decision Date: Aug 14, 2003

Employees of the Supreme Court faced disciplinary action for habitual tardiness; explanations like family duties, health, and traffic were deemed insufficient, resulting in suspensions or reprimands.

tardiness

disciplinary action

employees

Standard 13 min

END