G.R. No. 171827 - Monzon vs. Spouses Relova

Monzon vs. Spouses Relova

Getting related questions...
Conversations stay on your device. We do not store or track your activity on our servers. Know more about your privacy jur.ph/privacy Ask AI provides quick answers grounded in full case texts to avoid mistakes. Always verify with the original text.

Ask AI

Title Supreme Court: Monzon vs. Spouses Relova

Case: G.R. No. 171827

Decision Date: Sep 17, 2008

Teresita Monzon executed promissory notes and sold lands to respondents, later foreclosed by Coastal Lending Corp. Respondents sought residue from foreclosure; RTC ruled in their favor ex parte. Monzon appealed, claiming due process violation. Supreme Court reversed, remanding for further proceedings, citing due process breach and Rule 68 inapplicability.

promissory note

foreclosure

default

Standard 20 min

END