Title
Syhunliong vs. Rivera
Case
G.R. No. 200148
Decision Date
Jun 4, 2014
Former employee sued for libel over text messages seeking unpaid wages; Supreme Court ruled messages privileged, crime prescribed.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 200148)

Facts:

  • Parties and Employment
    • Ramon A. Syhunliong (petitioner) is President of BANFF Realty and Development Corporation and has interests in construction, restaurant, and hospital businesses. Teresita D. Rivera (respondent) was BANFF’s Accounting Manager from September 2002 with a monthly salary of ₱30,000.
    • Rivera tendered her resignation effective February 3, 2006, but continued working until March 2006 to turn over documents to her successor, Jennifer Lumapas.
  • Delay in Release of Pay and Text Messages
    • In April 2006, Rivera requested from Lumapas the payment of her remaining salaries, benefits, and incentives. Lumapas advised that Rivera’s incentive pay was on hold by Syhunliong and her salary check remained unsigned.
    • On April 6, 2006, Rivera sent two text messages to BANFF’s company phone (held by Lumapas), complaining of her “sufferings” in collecting her last pay, invoking God’s blessing, and urging Syhunliong to understand “the real meaning” of church attendance.
  • Labor Case and Libel Information
    • December 2006: Rivera filed a labor complaint with the NLRC for underpaid salaries, 13th–16th month pay, incentives, gratuities, and tax refund totaling ₱698,150.48.
    • April/June 2007: Syhunliong filed an information for libel against Rivera, alleging the April 6, 2006 text messages were malicious publications imputing a defect in his character. Rivera moved to quash the information on jurisdictional and substantive grounds.
  • RTC and CA Proceedings
    • December 4, 2008 and June 18, 2009: The RTC of Quezon City, Branch 84, denied Rivera’s Motion to Quash and her motion for reconsideration, finding probable cause and holding that privileged-communication and malice issues are for trial.
    • July 11, 2011 Decision and January 6, 2012 Resolution: The Court of Appeals granted Rivera’s petition for certiorari, dismissed the libel information for lack of defamatory imputation and as qualified privileged communication, and denied Syhunliong’s motion for reconsideration.

Issues:

  • Procedural Issues
    • Whether the denial of a Motion to Quash may be assailed via certiorari.
    • Whether Rivera’s voluntary arraignment before her Motion to Quash was resolved precludes her challenge.
  • Substantive Issues
    • Whether the Court of Appeals may review the RTC and Prosecutor’s finding of probable cause.
    • Whether the facts charged in the information constitute the crime of libel.
    • Whether the text messages are qualified privileged communications and thus subject only to defense at trial, not to Motion to Quash.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.