Title
Spouses David vs. Construction Industry and Arbitration Commission
Case
G.R. No. 159795
Decision Date
Jul 30, 2004
Construction firm CGI and its officers held liable for deviating from agreed building plans, leading to contract rescission and damages for defects and negligence.
A

Case Digest (G.R. No. 179817)

Facts:

  • Parties and Contract
    • Petitioners: Spouses Roberto and Evelyn David, officers of petitioner corporation Coordinated Group, Inc. (CGI), engaged in construction business.
    • Respondents: Spouses Narciso and Aida Quiambao, owners of land in Tondo, Manila.
    • On October 7, 1997, respondents engaged CGI to design and construct a five-storey concrete office/residential building on their property through a Design/Build Contract.
    • Contract terms included:
      • CGI to prepare working drawings;
      • Respondents to pay P7,309,821.51 for construction and P200,000 for design;
      • Construction completion within nine months from securing building permit; initially scheduled by July 16, 1998, extended to November 15, 1998.
  • Performance and Disputes
    • Petitioners allegedly failed to follow agreed plans and specifications.
    • Respondents demanded correction of errors, but petitioners did not act.
    • Respondents rescinded the contract on October 31, 1998, after paying 74.84% of construction cost.
    • Respondents hired another contractor to inspect and assess the unfinished project; findings revealed deviations and unauthorized plan revisions by petitioners.
  • Arbitration Proceedings
    • Respondents filed breach of contract case before Regional Trial Court (RTC) of Manila.
    • Parties agreed to submit dispute to Construction Industry Arbitration Commission (CIAC).
    • CIAC appointed Atty. Custodio O. Parlade as sole arbitrator; with assistance from Engr. Loreto C. Aquino.
    • After hearings and site inspections, arbitrator rendered an award ordering petitioners to pay respondents P4,073,229.94 plus interest, rejecting petitioners’ claims, and holding petitioners jointly and severally liable.
  • Court of Appeals and Supreme Court Action
    • Petitioners appealed to the Court of Appeals, which affirmed the arbitral decision but deleted the award for lost rentals.
    • Petitioners filed petition for review on certiorari before the Supreme Court, raising issues on unilateral rescission and corporate officers’ liability.

Issues:

  • Whether the respondents had legal and factual basis to unilaterally rescind the Design/Build Contract against petitioners who purportedly substantially performed their obligations.
  • Whether the petitioner-spouses Roberto and Evelyn David can be held jointly and severally liable with CGI, contrary to the doctrine of corporate juridical personality, given that they were merely officers of the corporation.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.