Case Digest (G.R. No. 159486-88) Core Legal Reasoning Model
Core Legal Reasoning Model
Facts:
In Roblett Industrial Construction Corporation (RICC) vs. Contractors Equipment Corporation (CEC), filed as G.R. No. 116682 and decided on January 2, 1997, CEC sued RICC in the Regional Trial Court (RTC) of Makati for the unpaid balance of leased construction equipment. In 1985, RICC rented various machinery from CEC, incurring charges of ₱342,909.38. On December 19, 1985, RICC’s Assistant Vice President for Finance, Candelario S. Aller Jr., executed an Agreement confirming the account, applying an offset of ₱115,000.00 for construction materials and reducing the balance to ₱227,909.38. A day earlier, RICC issued postdated checks totaling ₱10,000.00, which were dishonored and re-debited, raising the balance to ₱237,909.38. On July 24, 1986, CEC demanded payment by July 31, 1986; RICC asked for thirty days to settle. RICC later contended that the Agreement was unauthorized by its Board and that it had actually overpaid by approximately ₱12,000.00, based on Equipment Daily Time Re Case Digest (G.R. No. 159486-88) Expanded Legal Reasoning Model
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model
Facts:
- Lease of equipment and accumulation of debt
- In 1985, Contractors Equipment Corporation (CEC) leased various construction equipment to Roblett Industrial Construction Corporation (RICC), resulting in unpaid accounts totaling ₱342,909.38.
- On 18 December 1985, RICC issued postdated checks totaling ₱10,000 that were dishonored; on 19 December 1985, RICC’s AVP for Finance, Candelario S. Aller Jr., signed an Agreement with CEC confirming the account, applying an offset of ₱115,000.00 in construction materials and fixing the remaining balance at ₱227,909.38, which was subsequently increased to ₱237,909.38 due to the dishonored checks.
- Demand for payment and RICC’s defenses
- On 24 July 1986, CEC’s GM, Mariano R. Manaligod Jr., sent RICC a demand letter for ₱237,909.38, seeking settlement by 31 July 1986; RICC requested a 30-day extension.
- RICC alleged that the Agreement was unauthorized (signed without Board approval), asserted overpayment of ₱12,000.00 based on Equipment Daily Time Reports for 2 May–14 June 1985, and maintained that the Agreement did not reflect the true intention of the parties.
- Proceedings below
- Trial Court (19 December 1990): Found the Agreement valid and binding in its entirety, held RICC liable for ₱237,909.38 plus legal interest from 31 July 1986, awarded ₱2,000.00 litigation expenses, 20% attorney’s fees, and costs of suit.
- Court of Appeals (29 July 1994): Affirmed the Trial Court’s decision in toto.
Issues:
- Validity of the December 1985 Agreement
- Whether the Agreement is unenforceable for being an unauthorized contract (signed without Board approval).
- Extent of RICC’s payment obligation
- Whether RICC had fully paid its obligation under the lease and overpaid by ₱12,000.00 based on its daily time reports.
Ruling:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Ratio:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Doctrine:
- (Subscriber-Only)